| |

MurthyBulletin
VOL. XIII, no. 07;
Feb 2007, week 3
Posted : Feb 16, 2007
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"We know your immigration matters!"
SM
The
MurthyBulletin
is the eNewsletter on immigration from the Murthy Law
Firm.
This bulletin is not sent
unsolicited. The information provided is of a general nature and
may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It
should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an
engagement of the Murthy Law Firm. Full
Disclaimer available.
To receive MurthyBulletin via
eMail, follow this link to subscribe.
To Unsubscribe, please go to the end of
the eMailed MurthyBulletin and click the URL provided. This an
Announcement Only list. Subscribers cannot post to the list.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
TOPICS in this Edition of the MurthyBulletin
:
1.
March Visa
Bulletin : Still No Movement for EB Categories
2.
2007 Poverty
Guidelines Released
3.
Misrepresentation
and Fraud - Long-Term Consequences
4.
Ellis Island :
Our Immigrant Heritage
5. Did You Know about Our List of Immigrants?
6. Important Processing Times
and Dates
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
Engaging the Murthy Law
Firm
: Our
office can conveniently and efficiently
represent clients located
anywhere in the United States or abroad on U.S.
immigration matters.
Consultations with
attorneys at the Murthy Law Firm
: You may contact our office to
schedule a one-time paid consultation with no further obligation. A
scheduled consultation with an attorney at the Murthy Law Firm
provides you with details and recommendations based on the specific facts of
your case. This will help you with making the right decisions based on the
legal options and strategies available.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
1.
March Visa
Bulletin : Still No Movement for EB Categories
©MurthyDotCom
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) Visa Bulletin for March 2007 is identical
to the January and February 2007 Visa Bulletins for the Employment-Based
categories. It also contained a prediction with respect to EB3, stating that
little, if any, forward movement is expected in the near future. In fact, it
is possible that EB3 will retrogress even further. As a quick reference, the
contents of the Visa Bulletin are summarized below. [The most recent Visa
Bulletin chart is always available on
MurthyDotCom.]
©MurthyDotCom
Employment-Based First Preference (EB1)
©MurthyDotCom
This is current for all countries of chargeability.
©MurthyDotCom
Employment-Based Second Preference (EB2)
©MurthyDotCom
China and India have cutoff dates. All other countries of chargeability
remain current. China's cutoff date is April 22, 2005. India continues to
have a cutoff date of January 8, 2003.
©MurthyDotCom
Employment-Based Third Preference (EB3) - Possible Additional Retrogression
©MurthyDotCom
All countries have cutoff dates. India remains at May 8, 2001 and Mexico is
at May 15, 2001. China, the Philippines, and worldwide continue to have
cutoff dates of August 1, 2002.
©MurthyDotCom
As stated, the Visa Bulletin predicts that EB3 is unlikely to move forward
in the near future, and that any potential forward movement will be small.
The DOS notes that the demand for visa numbers with priority dates before
the August 2002 cutoff is expected to remain high, because both the
Department of Labor (DOL) and the USCIS are working to clear case backlogs.
These backlog reduction efforts could cause the dates to retrogress even
further in spring or summer 2007.
©MurthyDotCom
Other Workers
©MurthyDotCom
The Other Worker category still has an October 1, 2001 cutoff date.
©MurthyDotCom
Employment Based Fourth / Fifth / Religious Workers and Targeted Employment
©MurthyDotCom
The EB4, EB5, religious worker, and the targeted employment categories are
all current.
©MurthyDotCom
Translators
©MurthyDotCom
This is the new EB4 subcategory for Iraqi or Afghani nationals who have
worked with the U.S. Armed Forces as translators for at least 12 months. It
continues to have a September 18, 2006 cutoff.
©MurthyDotCom
Future
©MurthyDotCom
Predictions for the future, which are not positive, all pertain to EB3 and
are described above. The cutoff dates for the limited supply of visa numbers
are based on actual and anticipated demand for those numbers. This demand
for numbers is, to a large extent, being fueled by the approval of older
labor certifications through the DOL Backlog Processing Centers. We know
that this is a great source of frustration to many MurthyDotCom and
MurthyBulletin readers.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.
2007 Poverty
Guidelines Released
©MurthyDotCom
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) released the poverty
guidelines for 2007 at the end of January. These guidelines are effective
immediately. The guidelines are reviewed each year, and adjusted to account
for increases in the cost of living.
©MurthyDotCom
How Poverty Guidelines
Impact Immigration Cases
©MurthyDotCom
The tie-in between
immigration and the poverty guidelines is through the "public charge"
provisions. The guidelines are used to determine whether the income levels
of sponsors are adequate on the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support. This form
is needed in most family-based cases and some employment-based cases. Its
purpose is to establish that the sponsor's income is sufficient to support
the beneficiary, so that the foreign national will not become a public
charge. The affidavit of support requires a showing that there is enough
income to reach at least 125 percent of the current poverty level.
©MurthyDotCom
2007 Poverty Guidelines
©MurthyDotCom
The 2007 poverty guidelines are as follows. As mentioned above, the
requirement for the affidavit of support is 125 percent of the poverty line.
48 Contiguous
States plus Washington DC
|
|
Size of Family
Unit |
Guideline |
|
1 |
$
|
10,210 |
|
2 |
|
13,690 |
|
3 |
|
17,170 |
|
4 |
|
20,650 |
|
5 |
|
24,130 |
|
6 |
|
27,610 |
|
7 |
|
31,090 |
|
8 |
|
34,570 |
|
For family units with more than 8 members, add $3,480
for each additional member.
|
|
|
|
Size of Family
Unit |
Guideline |
|
1 |
$
|
12,770 |
|
2 |
|
17,120 |
|
3 |
|
21,470 |
|
4 |
|
25,820 |
|
5 |
|
30,170 |
|
6 |
|
34,520 |
|
7 |
|
38,870 |
|
8 |
|
43,220 |
|
For family units with more than 8 members, add $4,350
for each additional member.
|
|
|
|
Size of Family
Unit |
Guideline |
|
1 |
$
|
11,750 |
|
2 |
|
15,750 |
|
3 |
|
19,750 |
|
4 |
|
23,750 |
|
5 |
|
27,750 |
|
6 |
|
31,750 |
|
7 |
|
35,750 |
|
8 |
|
39,750 |
|
For family units with more than 8 members, add $4000 for each additional member. |
Other Assets Can Help in Meeting the 125%
©MurthyDotCom
As the table shows, the required income varies with the size of the
family and the geographic location. Previous sponsorship of other foreign
nationals can also impact the amount of income required. It is sometimes
possible to use assets if there is a lack of income. Additionally, it can
be possible to utilize the sponsorship of a more financially secure joint
sponsor, if needed.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
Specific questions regarding the affidavit of support should be directed to
an experienced immigration attorney. If you do not have an attorney, you may
wish to contact the Murthy Law Firm.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.
Misrepresentation
and Fraud - Long-Term Consequences
[a report from
Murthy Immigration Services, Pvt. Ltd.
in Chennai, India]
©MurthyDotCom
In the recent past,
Murthy Immigration Services, Pvt. Ltd. (MISPL)
has been contacted by a number of applicants who have been found ineligible
for a U.S. visa (such as an H1B or L-1) by the U.S. Consulate, due to fraud
or misrepresentation. The section of law that covers this is Immigration and
Nationality Act (INA) section 212(a)(6)(C)(i). Whether a violation exists is
determined by the consular officer, who makes the finding that a person is
inadmissible based on fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with
obtaining a U.S. visa, admission to the United States, or other immigration
benefit.
©MurthyDotCom
Implications of a Fraud Finding
©MurthyDotCom
INA section 212(a)(6)(c)(i) essentially covers fraud related to efforts to
obtain any immigration benefit. The result of a fraud finding is that the
individual is "inadmissible" (not allowed to enter the U.S. or adjust status
to permanent residence). Specifically, the section states the consequence of
fraud or misrepresentation as follows: “Any alien who, by fraud or willfully
misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure
or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United
States or other benefit provided under this Act is inadmissible.”
©MurthyDotCom
This section imposes a permanent inadmissibility on the visa applicant so
that s/he may never be allowed to enter the United States. Though waiver of
inadmissibility is available under limited circumstances, it is important
that each applicant understands the serious consequences of
misrepresentation and is truthful on the application.
©MurthyDotCom
Common Examples of Misrepresentation
©MurthyDotCom
F-1 / J-1 Visa Applicants MISLP has come across several students who have
been refused F-1 or J-1 visas under INA section 212(a)(6)(c)(i) for
producing false financial documentation. There are several consultants who
provide financial documentation for a fee. The aspiring students who use
this documentation are often totally unaware of the serious implications of
producing false documents. Such applicants not only end their probability of
obtaining a quality U.S. education and the degree that they seek, but in
most cases also practically seal the doors on entering the U.S. by their own
actions.
©MurthyDotCom
B-1 / B-2 Visa Applicants The other most common misrepresentation is made
by Business (B-1) / Tourist (B-2) as well as Student (F-1) visa applicants.
Under the assumption that the presence of a brother, sister, parent,
fiancée, and/or spouse living in the United States will cause the consulate
officer to refuse the visa application, applicants mark “No” in responses to the relevant
question on the DS-156 / DS-158, with regard to immediate relatives in the
United States. This is fraud as it amounts to a material misrepresentation
of facts in most cases, depending upon the class of visa for which one is
applying. Such applicants often end up with a refusal under INA section
212(a)(6)(c)(i).
©MurthyDotCom
H1B Visa Applicants The other common scenario of material
misrepresentation seen by us at MISLP is committed by H1B visa
aspirants who submit false experience or educational certificates
in the attempt to qualify for the H1B visa. The irony is that, in many
of the cases where false experience letters are submitted, the H1B visa
applicants may not even require prior work experience to be eligible for the
H1B visa. They often would have qualified simply based upon possessing the
appropriate educational degree.
©MurthyDotCom
False Evidence often Results in
Administrative
Review
©MurthyDotCom
The common explanation given by such erring applicants is that they were
misguided by consultants, employers, or friends. It must be understood that,
irrespective of who misguided them, when applicants are responsible for committing
the fraud or willful
misrepresentation of material facts. They, and not these abettors, will have
to face the consequences. Each individual is responsible for the documents
presented and the forms signed in his or her case. The Consulate has several means to verify
the genuineness of such documents and often issues administrative reviews
to verify the credibility of suspicious documentation.
©MurthyDotCom
Availability of Waiver
©MurthyDotCom
In limited circumstances, waivers are available for both nonimmigrant and
immigrant visas. This article should serve as a warning to MurthyDotCom
and MurthyBulletin readers, so that they do not commit fraud and
create the need for waivers. The requirements for the immigrant or
nonimmigrant waiver are outside the scope of this article, but nonimmigrant
waivers were the subject of our 2001 article,
Waivers for Nonimmigrant Visa Applicants, available on
MurthyDotCom. Anyone who has already been found to be in violation of
INA section 212(a)(6)(c)(i) should consult with a qualified immigration
attorney to determine what options, if any, are available. It should be
noted that the waivers are highly discretionary and difficult to obtain.
©MurthyDotCom
False Documentation Already Submitted
©MurthyDotCom
An applicant who uses fraudulent means toward the short-term goal of getting
into the United States often seals his/her own fate and loses the chance for
the future that was envisioned. The
inadmissibility, as has been stated, is permanent. Even if one has an
otherwise valid case in the future, the inadmissibility
will haunt them. The misrepresentation
becomes aggravated if the individual does not retract the fraudulent
document or misrepresented facts at the first opportunity. It often becomes
even more difficult to obtain waivers in such cases. In fact, the safest
approach in most instances is to promptly withdraw the visa application or
clear the record with the consular officer, either during the visa interview
or before a final fraud finding. One must consult with an experienced lawyer on the
implications and risks, should this situation arise.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
Even if full disclosure of the truth results in denial of the visa, at least
the possibility of later entering the U.S. remains open, whether in a
different classification or by the subsequent presentation of proof of
eligibility for the requested classification. Though waivers are available
in limited circumstances, the inadmissibility for misrepresentation is
difficult to overcome and often results in a permanent inability to enter
the United States. MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers are strongly
encouraged to be truthful when applying for visas or any other immigration
benefits. If there are any questions as to the proper way to answer a
particular question, it is best to consult with a qualified U.S.
immigration attorney before making any statements.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.
Ellis Island :
Our Immigrant Heritage
©MurthyDotCom
Those interested in U.S. immigrant heritage and history may enjoy spending
some time on the Ellis Island WebSite. The website contains 100 million immigration
documents, including searchable passenger lists and ship manifests. Ellis
Island was the first federal immigration inspection station, processing 12
million immigrants between 1892 and 1954. The descendants of these
immigrants account for about one-half of the current U.S. population. The
online documents provide history and genealogical information for both
novices and experts. It is also possible to visit Ellis Island, which is
located on an island in New York harbor, in the shadow of the
Statue of Liberty.
The experience is quite interesting and moving.
©MurthyDotCom
In addition to enabling those who wish to research their own
histories of immigration during the Ellis Island period, the website is also
a resource for other interesting information. The personal stories of
immigrant families remind us of our collective heritage in a section
containing
family histories from individuals with varied backgrounds. There is also
a section with
historical information on the various forces that drove people to immigrate to the United States
during different periods of world history.
Another rather charming piece of information is a list of famous Ellis
Island passenger arrivals. While some on the list were simply travelers and
not immigrants, many of the immigrant names are testimony of the contributions
of immigrants to the fabric of our society. From Albert Einstein to Charlie
Chaplin, the names of those who passed through Ellis Island are available.
©MurthyDotCom
The new information undoubtedly will be valuable to those who want to learn
about their pasts. It will also prove fun and informative to many
more. We hope that it serves as another
reminder to all of this nation's immigrant heritage and the key role that
immigrants and immigration play/ed in U.S. life and culture.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
5. MurthyDotCom : Did
You Know about Our List of Immigrants?
©MurthyDotCom
At MurthyDotCom we provide visitors with a
list of many who have immigrated to the United States. This alphabetical
list is a work-in-progress, serving as a constant reminder of the valuable
contributions immigrants have made, and continue to make today, to their
fellow citizens and to the rest of the world from their adopted homeland.
©MurthyDotCom
There will be no chat session on Feb 19, 2007 as Attorney Murthy will be
traveling.
The next session
MurthyChat will be Monday, February 26, 2007,
9:00pm Eastern Time (U.S.). Please check the
chat page for any
necessary changes to the schedule. Meanwhile,
search the chat
transcripts for
answers to your questions.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyForum :
Consider joining those who have discovered the value of this service. Our
message / discussion board is visited daily by one of our attorneys.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyDotCom - MurthyBulletin - MurthyChat - and MurthyForum - Your
ultimate U.S. immigration resources on the Internet all start with MURTHY!
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
6.
Important Processing Times and Dates
©MurthyDotCom
Processing Times : For
links to processing times for the USCIS Service Centers, district
(or local) processing times, the Administrative Appeals Office,
Department of State visa bulletin, and Department of Labor dates for the
processing of labor certification applications.
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved

|
|