| |

MurthyBulletin
VOL. XIII, no. 33;
August 2007, week 3
Posted : Aug 17, 2007
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"We know your immigration matters!"
SM
The
MurthyBulletin
is the eNewsletter on immigration from the Murthy Law
Firm.
This bulletin is not sent
unsolicited. The information provided is of a general nature and
may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It
should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an
engagement of the Murthy Law Firm. Full
Disclaimer available.
To receive MurthyBulletin via
eMail, follow this link to subscribe.
To Unsubscribe, please go to the end of
the eMailed MurthyBulletin and click the URL provided. This an
Announcement Only list. Subscribers cannot post to the list.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
TOPICS in this Edition of the MurthyBulletin
:
Late-Breaking News!
September Visa Bulletin - Some EB Categories Show Availability
1.
USCIS Assigns
Timeframes for Responses to RFEs
2.
Liability
for Employers who Receive No-Match Letters
3.
States' Regulation
of Foreign Workers is Arguably Unconstitutional
4.
August
15, 2007 : 60th Anniversary of Indian Independence
Posted on MurthyDotCom
August 14, 2007
5. MurthyBlog :
Unprecedented Filings in Record Time by the Murthy Law Firm!
6.
MurthyDotCom
: Did You Know about Our Page for Employers and Employees?
7. Important Processing Times
and Dates
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
Engaging the Murthy Law
Firm
: Our
office can conveniently and efficiently
represent clients located
anywhere in the United States or abroad on U.S.
immigration matters.
Consultations with
attorneys at the Murthy Law Firm
: You may contact our office to
schedule a one-time paid consultation with no further obligation. A
scheduled consultation with an attorney at the Murthy Law Firm
provides you with details and recommendations based on the specific facts of
your case. This will help you with making the right decisions based on the
legal options and strategies available.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
©MurthyDotCom
Late-Breaking News!
September Visa Bulletin - Some EB Categories Show Availability
©MurthyDotCom
The newly-released September Visa Bulletin from the U.S. Department of State
has brought some very good news. Unlike the August Visa Bulletin, in which
there were no visa numbers available for any of the employment-based (EB)
categories, the September Visa Bulletin has reestablished cutoff dates in
all EB categories. EB3 is the most limited, with unavailability still in
place for China, India, and Mexico, as well as for "other workers." However,
the news is far better for EB1 and EB2, many of whom will be eligible to
file for adjustment-of-status in September. The reason for the change from
August is that consulates, which receive allocations of visa numbers for
each month, return the unused numbers. Thus, consular posts have returned
numbers requested for July that were not used, so that these are now
available for September. [As always, the most recent
Visa Bulletin chart is available on MurthyDotCom.]
©MurthyDotCom
This means that some who missed the August 17th deadline for filing their
adjustment-of-status cases may be able to file in September 2007. Additionally, the
USCIS potentially will be able to approve older, pending cases with priority
dates that are current under the September Visa Bulletin.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
©MurthyDotCom
1.
USCIS Assigns
Timeframes for Responses to RFEs
©MurthyDotCom
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has specified
standard timeframes for responses to certain Requests for Evidence (RFEs)
and Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs). This is a further clarification of
the new response-time rule with regard to RFEs and NOIDs about which we
reported to MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers in our May
4, 2007 article, USCIS Regulation on Response Time for RFEs and NOIDs.
The new, flexible time for response went into effect on June 16, 2007,
replacing the old, standard twelve-week timeframe.
©MurthyDotCom
Response Times
©MurthyDotCom
The USCIS has issued specific response times that USCIS adjudicators should
follow while issuing RFEs and NOIDs. These timeframes are now published in
the Adjudicator's Field Manual (AFM), which provides guidance to all USCIS
officers who adjudicate petitions and applications for immigration benefits.
The timeframes depend on the circumstance underlying the USCIS officer's
decision to issue an RFE and/or NOID in any given case.
©MurthyDotCom
Below is a chart taken from the AFM that lists specific circumstances and
corresponding timeframes.
|
Circumstance |
Standard
Timeframe
(calendar days) |
| To submit
initial evidence that the form requires the applicant or petitioner
to file |
30 |
| To submit
evidence that Form I-539* requires |
30 |
| To submit
evidence available in the United States regardless of form type |
42 |
|
To
submit evidence available outside of the U. S. regardless of form
type |
84 |
---
*extension
of stay or change in status |
|
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
Most of the timeframes in the above chart reflect a significant decrease in
response time available from the standard twelve-week deadline. If, for
example, the document requested by an RFE provides for a 30-day response
time and it is not available and/or cannot be produced within that period of
time, the application or petition is likely to be denied. Therefore, we at
the Murthy Law Firm advise preparing as complete a petition or application
as possible before submitting it to the USCIS to reduce the chance of
receiving an unfavorable decision. If there are any documents that can be
anticipated as possibly being requested in an RFE, those should be gathered
in advance, so that they are immediately available for a timely RFE
response.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
2.
Liability for
Employers who Receive No-Match Letters
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which is an agency
within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), issued an updated
regulation
during the week on August 15, 2007, related to the hiring of undocumented
workers. The regulation includes new safe-harbor timeframes for employers to
verify certain information pertaining to the ability of an employee to work
legally in the United States. This regulation is particularly important in
light of increased ICE workplace enforcement efforts, as it expands and
provides for an employer's constructive knowledge and penalties for
violations of employment laws.
©MurthyDotCom
Employers' Deemed Constructive Knowledge
©MurthyDotCom
An employer is subject to various penalties if s/he knows that an employee
does not have proper employment authorization. This includes "constructive
knowledge" (i.e. indirect or circumstantial knowledge). There are three
situations in which an employer is deemed to have constructive knowledge,
yet be failing to take appropriate steps, that would have adverse
repercussions for the employer. First, when the employer is requested by an
employee to sponsor his/her labor certification or immigration petition.
Second, when the employer receives a letter from the Social Security
Administration (SSA) stating that the information submitted for an employee
does not match SSA records. Third, when the employer receives a DHS notice
that the immigration document used by the employer for verification purposes
while completing Form I-9 does not match the DHS records. It should be noted
that "no match" letters can be issued for reasons that are not immigration
related.
©MurthyDotCom
New Rule Provides Timeframes for Safe Harbors to Verify Discrepancies
©MurthyDotCom
The rule includes
"safe harbor" procedures that employers should follow in
order to avoid liability. The new procedures include timeframes considered
reasonable for an employer to take in order to verify the information
received from the SSA or the DHS. If the question of proper employment
authorization is not resolved within the prescribed time of about 90 days,
the employer has to complete a new I-9 employment verification form and
then may have to choose between terminating the employee and risking the
consequences of having constructive knowledge. There is no safe harbor
available for an employer whose employee has been sponsored for labor
certification or an immigration petition, if the employee does not have
legal status.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The new ICE regulations are supposed to help employers avoid liability by
providing timeframes to verify the status of their employees before taking
any action. This will also give some employees sufficient warning of having
to obtain valid employment authorization or provide explanations for any
discrepancies in their documentation. Employers need to be careful in their
hiring practices, to avoid discrimination, as well as avoiding immigration
violations. Hiring a competent and experienced immigration or employment
advisor and/or attorney is wise in regard to lawful hiring practices.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
3.
States' Regulation
of Foreign Workers is Arguably Unconstitutional
©MurthyDotCom
An
Arizona statute which regulates employment of undocumented foreign workers
is receiving national attention, as its constitutionality is going to be
challenged in federal court. The National Chamber Litigation Center, the
public policy law firm of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, represents the
Chamber of Commerce in the lawsuit and is going to argue that immigration is
a purely federal matter so that states cannot regulate it. The lawsuit,
Arizona Contractors Association v Napolitano, was brought by a coalition of
Arizona associations. The National Chamber Litigation Center is going to
present an argument that the statute in question "deserves to be overturned,
because it violates employers' due process rights."
©MurthyDotCom
Immigration is a Purely Federal Issue
©MurthyDotCom
The Arizona statute challenged by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce may soon join
a number of other states' statutes already been struck down that attempted
to regulate employment of foreign workers. The state statutes are not being
allowed to stand, mainly because immigration is supposed to be regulated by
the federal government and not by individual states. As was reported in our
August 3, 2007 MurthyBulletin article,
Court Strikes Hazelton
Municipal Ordinances Against Immigrants, a
federal judge of the central Pennsylvania district struck down ordinances in
the town of Hazleton in Pennsylvania on July 26, 2007. The ordinances
provided for harsh punishment for undocumented foreign nationals and
employers and landlords who provide them with homes and jobs.
©MurthyDotCom
The Role of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
©MurthyDotCom
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce supports legal challenges to the
constitutionality of various state and municipal laws that regulate
employment of foreign workers. In the case of the town of Hazleton, the
Chamber submitted an amicus brief successfully challenging the validity of
the ordinances. In the present case, the Chamber took a more proactive
approach, actually representing a plaintiff in the lawsuit.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The regulation of employment of foreign workers is a federal matter. Under
the U.S. Constitution, no individual states are allowed to take control over
employers and their foreign employees. As more and more state statutes and
municipal ordinances are being struck down, it is becoming clear, once
again, that immigration is to be controlled on a federal level. If the
states want greater enforcement, then they need to put pressure on the
federal government to do so. The federal government has, in fact, recently
stepped up efforts in workplace enforcement.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
4.
August
15, 2007 : 60th Anniversary of Indian Independence
Posted on MurthyDotCom
August 14, 2007
©MurthyDotCom
We at the Murthy Law Firm would like to take this opportunity to
belatedly wish our
clients and our readers from India a very happy Independence Day, on this 60th anniversary
of Indian swatantra, or independence. It is our pleasure, at this
time, to also announce the joint commitment of the Murthy Law Firm
and the MurthyFoundation to the expansion plan of the
United Way Friends of India program. As such, we will help to promote
voluntary charitable giving in India, for the welfare of her citizens.
©MurthyDotCom
Read more on this topic in the United Way press release, available on
MurthyDotCom in PDF format.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
5. MurthyBlog :
Unprecedented Filings in Record Time by the Murthy Law Firm!
©MurthyDotCom An entry from Attorney Murthy's personal blog
is selected on a regular basis and included here. To keep up with the
MurthyBlog in its entirety, find it at (http://www.murthyblog.com).
©MurthyDotCom
Unprecedented Filings in Record Time by the Murthy Law Firm!
©MurthyDotCom
Attorney Murthy shares with readers how the dedication of her entire staff
led to our successfully meeting all deadlines to file I-485s and related
cases for our Murthy Law Firm clients.
©MurthyDotCom
This Blog is available at (http://www.murthyblog.com/murthyblog/2007/08/unprecedented-f.html).
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
©MurthyDotCom
6. MurthyDotCom : Did You Know about Our Page for Employers and Employees?
©MurthyDotCom
At MurthyDotCom
we know that many immigrants come to the United States chasing employment
opportunities. On the other side of this equation are the U.S. employers who
are looking for the best, brightest, most willing job applicants to fill
positions in their companies. In the middle is the U.S. government. Among
the government agencies affecting this match are the U.S. Department of
State that determines whether to grant a visa to a worker bound for the
U.S.;
the Department of Homeland
Security, whose dual role is to grant benefits as well as secure borders;
and the Department of Labor that seeks to protect the U.S. workforce, while
facilitating employer access to the non-U.S. workers they require.
Find relevant news effecting employers and immigrant workers on our
Employment
Page on
MurthyDotCom.
©MurthyDotCom
The next session of the
MurthyChat will be Monday, Aug 20, 2007,
9:00pm Eastern Time (U.S.). Please check the chat page for any
necessary changes to the schedule. Meanwhile, search the chat transcripts for
answers to your questions.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyForum :
Consider joining those who have discovered the value of this service. Our
message / discussion board is visited daily by one of our attorneys.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyDotCom - MurthyBulletin - MurthyChat - and MurthyForum - Your
ultimate U.S. immigration resources on the Internet all start with MURTHY!
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
©MurthyDotCom
7.
Important Processing Times and Dates
©MurthyDotCom
Processing Times : For
links to processing times for the USCIS Service Centers, district
(or local) processing times, the Administrative Appeals Office,
Department of State visa bulletin, and Department of Labor dates for the
processing of labor certification applications.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved

|
|