MurthyBulletin
VOL. XIII, no. 33; August 2007, week 3
Posted : Aug 17, 2007

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

"We know your immigration matters!" SM

The MurthyBulletin is the eNewsletter on immigration from the Murthy Law Firm. This bulletin is not sent unsolicited. The information provided is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Murthy Law Firm. Full Disclaimer available.

To receive MurthyBulletin via eMail, follow this link to subscribe. To Unsubscribe, please go to the end of the eMailed MurthyBulletin and click the URL provided. This an Announcement Only list. Subscribers cannot post to the list.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOPICS in this Edition of the MurthyBulletin :

Late-Breaking News!
September Visa Bulletin - Some EB Categories Show Availability

1. USCIS Assigns Timeframes for Responses to RFEs

2.
Liability for Employers who Receive No-Match Letters

3.
States' Regulation of Foreign Workers is Arguably Unconstitutional

4.
August 15, 2007 : 60th Anniversary of Indian Independence
Posted on MurthyDotCom August 14, 2007


5. MurthyBlog :
Unprecedented Filings in Record Time by the Murthy Law Firm!

6. MurthyDotCom : Did You Know about Our Page for Employers and Employees?


7. Important Processing Times and Dates

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Engaging the Murthy Law FirmOur office can conveniently and efficiently represent clients located anywhere in the United States or abroad on U.S. immigration matters.

Consultations with attorneys at the Murthy Law Firm
You may contact our office to schedule a one-time paid consultation with no further obligation. A scheduled consultation with an attorney at the Murthy Law Firm provides you with details and recommendations based on the specific facts of your case. This will help you with making the right decisions based on the legal options and strategies available.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
Late-Breaking News!
September Visa Bulletin - Some EB Categories Show Availability
©MurthyDotCom
The newly-released September Visa Bulletin from the U.S. Department of State has brought some very good news. Unlike the August Visa Bulletin, in which there were no visa numbers available for any of the employment-based (EB) categories, the September Visa Bulletin has reestablished cutoff dates in all EB categories. EB3 is the most limited, with unavailability still in place for China, India, and Mexico, as well as for "other workers." However, the news is far better for EB1 and EB2, many of whom will be eligible to file for adjustment-of-status in September. The reason for the change from August is that consulates, which receive allocations of visa numbers for each month, return the unused numbers. Thus, consular posts have returned numbers requested for July that were not used, so that these are now available for September. [As always, the most recent Visa Bulletin chart is available on MurthyDotCom.]
©MurthyDotCom
This means that some who missed the August 17th deadline for filing their adjustment-of-status cases may be able to file in September 2007. Additionally, the USCIS potentially will be able to approve older, pending cases with priority dates that are current under the September Visa Bulletin.

©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
1.
USCIS Assigns Timeframes for Responses to RFEs
©MurthyDotCom
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has specified standard timeframes for responses to certain Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs). This is a further clarification of the new response-time rule with regard to RFEs and NOIDs about which we reported to MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers in our May 4, 2007 article, USCIS Regulation on Response Time for RFEs and NOIDs. The new, flexible time for response went into effect on June 16, 2007, replacing the old, standard twelve-week timeframe.
©MurthyDotCom
Response Times
©MurthyDotCom
The USCIS has issued specific response times that USCIS adjudicators should follow while issuing RFEs and NOIDs. These timeframes are now published in the Adjudicator's Field Manual (AFM), which provides guidance to all USCIS officers who adjudicate petitions and applications for immigration benefits. The timeframes depend on the circumstance underlying the USCIS officer's decision to issue an RFE and/or NOID in any given case.
©MurthyDotCom
Below is a chart taken from the AFM that lists specific circumstances and corresponding timeframes.
Circumstance

Standard Timeframe
(calendar days)

To submit initial evidence that the form requires the applicant or petitioner to file 30
To submit evidence that Form I-539* requires 30
To submit evidence available in the United States regardless of form type 42
To submit evidence available outside of the U. S. regardless of form type 84
---
*extension of stay or change in status
 

Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
Most of the timeframes in the above chart reflect a significant decrease in response time available from the standard twelve-week deadline. If, for example, the document requested by an RFE provides for a 30-day response time and it is not available and/or cannot be produced within that period of time, the application or petition is likely to be denied. Therefore, we at the Murthy Law Firm advise preparing as complete a petition or application as possible before submitting it to the USCIS to reduce the chance of receiving an unfavorable decision. If there are any documents that can be anticipated as possibly being requested in an RFE, those should be gathered in advance, so that they are immediately available for a timely RFE response.

©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
2.
Liability for Employers who Receive No-Match Letters

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which is an agency within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), issued an updated regulation during the week on August 15, 2007, related to the hiring of undocumented workers. The regulation includes new safe-harbor timeframes for employers to verify certain information pertaining to the ability of an employee to work legally in the United States. This regulation is particularly important in light of increased ICE workplace enforcement efforts, as it expands and provides for an employer's constructive knowledge and penalties for violations of employment laws.
©MurthyDotCom
Employers' Deemed Constructive Knowledge
©MurthyDotCom
An employer is subject to various penalties if s/he knows that an employee does not have proper employment authorization. This includes "constructive knowledge" (i.e. indirect or circumstantial knowledge). There are three situations in which an employer is deemed to have constructive knowledge, yet be failing to take appropriate steps, that would have adverse repercussions for the employer. First, when the employer is requested by an employee to sponsor his/her labor certification or immigration petition. Second, when the employer receives a letter from the Social Security Administration (SSA) stating that the information submitted for an employee does not match SSA records. Third, when the employer receives a DHS notice that the immigration document used by the employer for verification purposes while completing Form I-9 does not match the DHS records. It should be noted that "no match" letters can be issued for reasons that are not immigration related.
©MurthyDotCom
New Rule Provides Timeframes for Safe Harbors to Verify Discrepancies
©MurthyDotCom
The rule include
s "safe harbor" procedures that employers should follow in order to avoid liability. The new procedures include timeframes considered reasonable for an employer to take in order to verify the information received from the SSA or the DHS. If the question of proper employment authorization is not resolved within the prescribed time of about 90 days, the employer has to complete a new I-9 employment verification form and then may have to choose between terminating the employee and risking the consequences of having constructive knowledge. There is no safe harbor available for an employer whose employee has been sponsored for labor certification or an immigration petition, if the employee does not have legal status.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The new ICE regulations are supposed to help employers avoid liability by providing timeframes to verify the status of their employees before taking any action. This will also give some employees sufficient warning of having to obtain valid employment authorization or provide explanations for any discrepancies in their documentation. Employers need to be careful in their hiring practices, to avoid discrimination, as well as avoiding immigration violations. Hiring a competent and experienced immigration or employment advisor and/or attorney is wise in regard to lawful hiring practices.

©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
3.
States' Regulation of Foreign Workers is Arguably Unconstitutional
©MurthyDotCom
An Arizona statute which regulates employment of undocumented foreign workers is receiving national attention, as its constitutionality is going to be challenged in federal court. The National Chamber Litigation Center, the public policy law firm of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, represents the Chamber of Commerce in the lawsuit and is going to argue that immigration is a purely federal matter so that states cannot regulate it. The lawsuit, Arizona Contractors Association v Napolitano, was brought by a coalition of Arizona associations. The National Chamber Litigation Center is going to present an argument that the statute in question "deserves to be overturned, because it violates employers' due process rights."
©MurthyDotCom
Immigration is a Purely Federal Issue
©MurthyDotCom
The Arizona statute challenged by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce may soon join a number of other states' statutes already been struck down that attempted to regulate employment of foreign workers. The state statutes are not being allowed to stand, mainly because immigration is supposed to be regulated by the federal government and not by individual states. As was reported in our August 3, 2007 MurthyBulletin article,
Court Strikes Hazelton Municipal Ordinances Against Immigrants, a federal judge of the central Pennsylvania district struck down ordinances in the town of Hazleton in Pennsylvania on July 26, 2007. The ordinances provided for harsh punishment for undocumented foreign nationals and employers and landlords who provide them with homes and jobs.
©MurthyDotCom
The Role of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
©MurthyDotCom
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce supports legal challenges to the constitutionality of various state and municipal laws that regulate employment of foreign workers. In the case of the town of Hazleton, the Chamber submitted an amicus brief successfully challenging the validity of the ordinances. In the present case, the Chamber took a more proactive approach, actually representing a plaintiff in the lawsuit.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The regulation of employment of foreign workers is a federal matter. Under the U.S. Constitution, no individual states are allowed to take control over employers and their foreign employees. As more and more state statutes and municipal ordinances are being struck down, it is becoming clear, once again, that immigration is to be controlled on a federal level. If the states want greater enforcement, then they need to put pressure on the federal government to do so. The federal government has, in fact, recently stepped up efforts in workplace enforcement.

©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
4.
August 15, 2007 : 60th Anniversary of Indian Independence
Posted on MurthyDotCom August 14, 2007

©MurthyDotCom
We at the Murthy Law Firm would like to take this opportunity to belatedly wish our clients and our readers from India a very happy Independence Day, on this 60th anniversary of Indian swatantra, or independence. It is our pleasure, at this time, to also announce the joint commitment of the Murthy Law Firm and the MurthyFoundation to the expansion plan of the United Way Friends of India program. As such, we will help to promote voluntary charitable giving in India, for the welfare of her citizens.
©MurthyDotCom
Read more on this topic in the United Way press release, available on MurthyDotCom in PDF format.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
5. MurthyBlog :
Unprecedented Filings in Record Time by the Murthy Law Firm!
©MurthyDotCom
An entry from Attorney Murthy's personal blog is selected on a regular basis and included here. To keep up with the MurthyBlog in its entirety, find it at (http://www.murthyblog.com).
©MurthyDotCom
Unprecedented Filings in Record Time by the Murthy Law Firm!
©MurthyDotCom
Attorney Murthy shares with readers how the dedication of her entire staff led to our successfully meeting all deadlines to file I-485s and related cases for our Murthy Law Firm clients.
©MurthyDotCom
This Blog is available at (
http://www.murthyblog.com/murthyblog/2007/08/unprecedented-f.html).
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
6. MurthyDotCom : Did You Know about Our Page for Employers and Employees?
©MurthyDotCom
At MurthyDotCom we know that many immigrants come to the United States chasing employment opportunities. On the other side of this equation are the U.S. employers who are looking for the best, brightest, most willing job applicants to fill positions in their companies. In the middle is the U.S. government. Among the government agencies affecting this match are the U.S. Department of State that determines whether to grant a visa to a worker bound for the U.S.; the Department of Homeland Security, whose dual role is to grant benefits as well as secure borders; and the Department of Labor that seeks to protect the U.S. workforce, while facilitating employer access to the non-U.S. workers they require. Find relevant news effecting employers and immigrant workers on our Employment Page on MurthyDotCom.
©MurthyDotCom
The next session of the MurthyChat will be Monday, Aug 20, 2007, 9:00pm Eastern Time (U.S.). Please check the chat page for any necessary changes to the schedule. Meanwhile, search the chat transcripts for answers to your questions. 
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyForum : Consider joining those who have discovered the value of this service. Our message / discussion board is visited daily by one of our attorneys.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyDotCom - MurthyBulletin - MurthyChat - and MurthyForum - Your ultimate U.S. immigration resources on the Internet all start with MURTHY!
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
©MurthyDotCom
7. Important Processing Times and Dates

©MurthyDotCom
Processing Times : For links to processing times for the USCIS Service Centers, district (or local) processing times, the Administrative Appeals Office, Department of State visa bulletin, and Department of Labor dates for the processing of labor certification applications.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved


 

 
  Disclaimer : The information provided at this site is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or under all circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Murthy Law Firm or establish an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright : Documents from this site may be printed for personal use as long as the copyright notices are included on the print-outs and the documents are not modified or altered.