| |

MurthyBulletin
VOL. XV, no. 35;
Aug 2009, week 4
Posted : Aug 28, 2009
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
We know your immigration matters!
SM
The
MurthyBulletin
is the eNewsletter on immigration from the Murthy Law
Firm.
The information provided is of a general nature and
may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It
should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an
engagement of the Murthy Law Firm. Full
Disclaimer available.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
TOPICS in this Edition of the
MurthyBulletin
:
1.
Investigations
and Sluggish Economy Slow FY2010 H1B Filings
2. I-9
Audits of Employers on the Rise
3.
New York Shuts
Down Immigration Services Companies for UPL
4. Next Week :
Murthy's Corporate Teleconference - Wed,
Sep 02, 2009
5. MurthyDotCom : Did You Know about Our Compliance Page?
6. Important Processing Times and Dates
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
Engaging the Murthy Law
Firm
: Our
office can conveniently and efficiently
represent clients located
anywhere in the United States or abroad on U.S.
immigration matters.
Consultations with
attorneys at the Murthy Law Firm
: You may contact our office to
schedule a one-time paid consultation with no further obligation. A
scheduled consultation with an attorney at the Murthy Law Firm
provides you with details and recommendations based on the specific facts of
your case. This will help you with making the right decisions based on the
legal options and strategies available.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
1.
Investigations
and Sluggish Economy Slow FY2010 H1B Filings
©MurthyDotCom
The substantial reduction in the number of filings for H1B
petitions has generated questions from some H1B-cap watchers regarding
whether there is a set closing date for filing H1B cap petitions for fiscal
year (FY) 2010. The answer to this is no. Cap-subject H1B petitions can be
filed for the full FY, or until the numbers are all used. As of this
writing, cap numbers remain available and overall usage remains light.
©MurthyDotCom
Cap Numbers Still Available
©MurthyDotCom
As indicated in our August 19, 2009
update on the H1B cap,
approximately 45,000 H1B visa numbers had been used toward the regular
FY2010 H1B cap. A complete tracking of the H1B cap counts for the FY2010
filings is available on MurthyDotCom. We will continue to provide updated
cap counts until the cap is reached or the end of
the FY.
©MurthyDotCom
Experiences from Previous Years
©MurthyDotCom
The H1B cap became a significant issue in FY2004. As explained in our
September 12, 2003 article,
H1B Cap for Fiscal Year
2004, the cap decreased significantly in FY2004. As our
NewsFlash! The H1B Cap Has
Been Reached
at the time indicated, the regular H1B cap for FY2004 was not reached until
February 17, 2004. This meant that employers were able to file for H1B
petitions under the FY2004 cap from April 1, 2003 until February 17, 2004, a
period of more than ten months. Over the next years, the cap was reached
earlier each year. In FY2005, it was reached on October 1, 2004. In FY2006,
it was reached on August 10, 2005, and in FY2007, the regular cap was met on
May 26, 2006.
©MurthyDotCom
The cap limits continued to be a problem in FY2008 and FY2009. In those
years, the regular cap was exceeded during the initial filing period. Cap
numbers were allocated based on a lottery system.
©MurthyDotCom
Closing Date for FY2010
©MurthyDotCom
The rate of filings for FY2010 is far different from that of the past couple
of years. Thus, as of this writing, there are sufficient H1B cap numbers
available. Also playing into the availability of cap numbers is the
increased scrutiny of H1B petitions, particularly those filed by IT
consulting companies. This has resulted in higher rates of denials and a
general chilling effect on those companies that might otherwise file
additional H1B petitions. If the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) does not receive enough approvable H1B petitions to exhaust the
regular H1B cap for 2010, it will continue to accept H1B petitions against
this cap until the end of the FY2010 which will be September 30, 2010.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The already slow economy may be held back further from recovery if the
government overreaches as it focuses on violations. While enforcement of
laws and tracking violators are important, employers should not be
discouraged from filing proper H1B petitions for needed workers. In the long
run, this has an adverse impact. In order to exhaust the regular H1B cap for
FY2010, employers will have to file H1B petitions at a much higher rate. If
the numbers hold out until October 1st, then employers will be able to
request immediate start dates for employees. This may result in some
additional filings, as it is more in keeping with the real-world needs of
employers. Most companies cannot wait for several months for temporary
workers to begin employment in H1B status, and cannot predict their needs
months in advance. The rates of filings, however, are ultimately tied to the
economy and the needs of U.S. employers. We at the Murthy Law Firm continue
to accept new H1B filings for FY2010, and will do so as long as cap numbers
remain available. Our attorneys are also available to advise U.S. employers
on all of their questions regarding the H1B category.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.
I-9 Audits of Employers on the Rise
©MurthyDotCom
John T. Morton, the new Assistant Secretary of U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE), under the Department of Homeland Security, recently
stated that ICE intends to increase its attention to auditing I-9,
employment eligibility verification forms. The Wall Street Journal reported
that Mr. Morton made this statement during a speech given in southern
California on August 17, 2009. As many employers are aware, I-9 forms must
be completed and retained by U.S. employers under specific requirements.
©MurthyDotCom
652 Companies Already Receive Notices of Inspection
©MurthyDotCom
Chief Morton noted that ICE has already dramatically increased the number of
Form I-9 audit notices issued to U.S. companies. These audits stand at 652
Notices of Inspection (NOIs) for July 2009, alone. Chief Morton said that
many more employers will be notified in the coming months that their I-9s
and company records will be audited. As part of an I-9 audit, ICE agents
review I-9 forms, company payroll records, W-2 reports, and other documents.
They seek to determine whether the employer has properly checked the new
employee's identity and work authorization, and re-verified authorization, as
needed for temporary authorizations. They also ascertain whether any
counterfeit documents were used as proof of identity and/or employment
authorization.
©MurthyDotCom
Range of Monetary Fines against Employers for I-9 Violations
©MurthyDotCom
As explained in our September 16, 2008 article,
Form I-9 Compliance and
Working with ICE, fines for I-9
violations range from $110 for one single, minor or technical violation, up
to $3,200 per violation for serious first offenses. A third offense can lead
to a fine of up to $16,000, per offense. Employers should take compliance
with Form I-9 requirements seriously, as there are multiple possible
violations per form.
©MurthyDotCom
Additional Penalties against Employers for Criminal Law Violations
©MurthyDotCom
An I-9 audit may lead ICE agents to evidence that criminal law violations
have occurred. ICE may accuse employers of knowingly hiring, retaining, or
even harboring workers who are not authorized for employment in the U.S. If
the use of fraudulent, stolen, or counterfeit documents is found to be
prevalent at a U.S. employer, and the company appears to be involved in the
falsifications, the company and its management run the risk of charges of
conspiracy or, as seen below, of aiding and abetting in the use of false
statements on Forms I-9.
©MurthyDotCom
Company Directors Guilty of Felony Immigration Violations
©MurthyDotCom
The first immigration enforcement action by the Obama Administration came to
a partial conclusion on August 18, 2009 in Washington state. ICE issued a
press release on August
18, 2009 announcing that two corporate directors of a family-owned business
in Bellingham, Washington had pled guilty to felony immigration violations.
These two directors, siblings, each pled guilty to one federal felony count
of aiding and abetting in the use of a false statement on immigration
employment forms (also known as Forms I-9).
©MurthyDotCom
Our regular MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers may recall a discussion
of these matters in our July 10, 2009
NewsBrief,
ICE to Audit 652
Companies for I-9 Compliance.
When entering their pleas of guilty, these two directors admitted to
knowledge that workers at their company had submitted false names and social
security numbers during their I-9 processes. The directors were the production
manager and human resources manager for Yamato Engine Specialists 1990, Ltd.
The company itself has been charged with encouraging and inducing illegal
aliens to reside in the U.S. and may face stiff fines for its actions.
©MurthyDotCom
Chief Morton's Views on I-9 Violations by Employers
©MurthyDotCom
The ICE
press release
includes a quote from Assistant Secretary Morton: "ICE will continue to
investigate and find employers who flout our laws and hire illegal labor, in
order to reduce the demand for illegal employment and protect employment
opportunities for the nation's lawful workforce."
©MurthyDotCom
Obama Administration Strategy of Targeting Employers and Management
©MurthyDotCom
The increase in ICE's I-9 audits is a result of the Obama Administration's
new strategy of focusing its enforcement efforts on U.S. employers who have
violated immigration laws. These employers are viewed by some as the source
of demand for undocumented or unauthorized workers. This new strategy was
reviewed in our March 1, 2009
NewsBrief,
Obama Administration
Increases Employer Investigations. It is
also interesting to note how the Bellingham, WA raid, described above, shows
this shift in strategy. ICE raids under the Bush Administration, resulted in
unauthorized workers being detained and, often, removed from the United
States. Many ICE raids in previous years did not focus on charges against
managers, directors, or owners of the investigated companies, although there
was some attention to such individuals. This particular investigation has
now concluded with guilty pleas from two members of the company's senior
management team.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
In the current climate of multiple investigations and even criminal
prosecution of U.S. employers violating laws in the hiring and retention of
foreign workers, it is imperative that each employer understand and comply
with the requirements of Form I-9 and other applicable immigration
requirements. The Murthy Law Firm will continue to track changes to ICE, DHS's Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS) office, and the DOL's
enforcement focus, so that MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers can be
informed of significant changes, as this hot-button issue carries
alarming consequences for many.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.
New York Shuts
Down Immigration Services Companies for UPL
©MurthyDotCom
The New York State Attorney General's Office announced the shutting down of
three New York businesses that had been providing fraudulent immigration
legal services. Details can be found in an August 20, 2009
press release. This is
reported to MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers to raise awareness of
the problem of unauthorized practice of law (UPL) in the immigration field.
©MurthyDotCom
New York Attorney General Taking Action
©MurthyDotCom
Three companies are being sued by the New York State Attorney General,
Andrew M. Cuomo, for providing legal services without authorization or
accreditation. It is unfortunate, but all too common that individuals rely
on such services for their immigration cases. Immigration legal
representation can only be provided by licensed attorneys or, in limited
situations, by representatives granted accredited status by the Board of
Immigration Appeals.
©MurthyDotCom
Common Problems Caused by Services Engaged in
UPL
©MurthyDotCom
A wide range of problems is created by those who engaged in UPL. Using their
services sometimes results in a waste of money, at the least. The losses can be far
more severe, however. These services sometimes are fraudulent, resulting in
papers being filed with false documents or in nothing being filed at all. At
other times, those offering the services are inept, filing cases improperly
and providing incorrect advice.
©MurthyDotCom
U.S. immigration law is
complex, as regular MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers are aware. While a part of immigration law
involves the filing of certain forms, the requirements go far beyond filling
in the blanks. The U.S. immigration legal system consists of statutes,
regulations, guidance, policy memos, and unwritten practices. On top of
this, immigration law has a myriad of procedural requirements and strict
deadlines. When these requirements and deadlines are not met, it can be
difficult and often impossible to remedy the problems created. The errors in
cases first handled by unauthorized "immigration consultants" often create
undue complexities that would never have arisen under the care of a
knowledgeable immigration attorney.
©MurthyDotCom
The Victims of Incompetent
or UPL Representation
©MurthyDotCom
Foreign
nationals affected by the companies, or others like them, that are being shut down and sued by the New York
State Attorney General should consult with
experienced attorneys to find out what options may be available to them.
Immigrants have historically been victimized by those who seek to take
advantage of their needs and unfamiliarity with this country. These
unauthorized immigration services are just another example. Some of them
proclaim on their websites that there is no need to spend money on lawyers,
and portray lawyers as overpriced and unnecessary. The truth is that there
is nothing as overpriced as useless, incorrect, and damaging advice that
results in a denial or possible removal / deportation.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The Murthy
Law Firm stands against the UPL and businesses engaged in similar activities because we care about
helping immigrants, who are a vital part of this country. We have seen too
many victims of UPL, hoping we can fix the messes left of their cases.
Often, these individuals approach good, knowledgeable lawyers when it is too
late to undo the damage. The price that is paid for using these services
is sometimes financial ruin, separation of family members, and the ability to remain legally in the United
States. We appreciate the strong
position of New York, and we trust that other states will follow this
example to protect the vulnerable immigrant community.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
4. Next Week :
Murthy's Corporate Teleconference - Wed,
Sep 02, 2009
Topic :
When
USCIS Comes Knocking - the USCIS Office of Fraud Detection and
National Security (FDNS)
©MurthyDotCom
The
topic of our September 2, 2009 session in this teleconference series is
visits by officers from the USCIS Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS)
Office. In this overview, attorneys from the Murthy Law Firm will discuss
the increasing frequency of such visits to H1B employers, employers’ options
in responding to such visits, what to do if the officers want to speak with
employees, the authority of the FDNS officers, and the potential
consequences of such visits, among other issues.
©MurthyDotCom
Employers and their
representatives :
register for
Aug 05, 2009 here.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
5. MurthyDotCom : Did You Know about Our
Compliance Page?
©MurthyDotCom
In this post-9/11 world, immigration enforcement has been tied to national
security concerns and caused a shift in focus to "enforcement first" as our
nation's immigration policy. The result is stepped-up workplace
investigations and regular raids of allegedly noncompliant worksites. These
enforcement efforts on the part of U.S. government agencies are not limited
to attempts to locate undocumented workers. Employers who are believed to be
in violation of the requirements of employment-based immigration sponsorship
are also targeted. We at the Murthy Law Firm are prepared to help your
company avoid expensive fines and interruption to production, through
compliance with U.S. government requirements. More on this is available on
our Compliance Page
on MurthyDotCom.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyChat :
The next MurthyChat session will be Monday,
Aug 31, 2009, 9:00pm Eastern Time (U.S.). The chat generally occurs on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month,
but since the first Monday in September is the Labor Day holiday, we will
hold a chat session on Aug 31st, instead. Please check the
chat page for any
necessary changes to the schedule. Meanwhile,
search the chat
transcripts for
answers to your questions.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyForum :
Consider joining those who have discovered the value of this service. Our
message / discussion board is visited daily by one of our attorneys.
©MurthyDotCom
MurthyDotCom - MurthyBulletin - MurthyChat - and MurthyForum - Your
ultimate U.S. immigration resources on the Internet all start with MURTHY!
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
6.
Important Processing Times and Dates
©MurthyDotCom
Processing Times : For
links to processing times for the USCIS Service Centers, district
(or local) processing times, the Administrative Appeals Office,
Department of State visa bulletin, and Department of Labor dates for the
processing of labor certification applications.
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
©MurthyDotCom
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved

|
|