 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

|
|
Unusual
Requests for Evidence in NIW Cases
Posted
May 13, 2000
In this article in the MurthyBulletin, we
wish to share some interesting information and facts on the EB-1 and NIW
categories to obtain the "green card." The Immigration and
Naturalization Service (INS) presumes that it is in the U.S. national
interest for most foreign nationals seeking green cards to undergo labor
certification. Labor certification, as many of you may be aware, is a
competitive recruitment process, where the U.S. employer demonstrates to the
U.S. Department of Labor that the employer has not been able to find a
qualified U.S. worker to perform the same job duties as the foreign
national. On the other hand, certain advanced degree professionals or those
who are considered "exceptional" and who have demonstrated a
significant impact on their selected field, may be eligible for the National
Interest Waiver (NIW) process.
Recently, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) observed that
there has been a significant increase in denials of NIW cases and is
gathering information to submit to the INS. AILA is gathering information to
show the INS the unusual language in some of the NIW denials so that the INS
can train their officers, when necessary, on the law. Many of these cases
would probably have met with success in the past, prior to the NYSDOT case
in August 1998, which has been discussed in various editions of the MurthyBulletin.
Typically, before the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issues a
denial in any type of case, it first sends a Request for Evidence (RFE).
Receipt of an RFE enables the candidate the opportunity to present
additional evidence, for a fair and accurate determination. This procedure
is in keeping with the purpose of the NIW - to create an avenue to obtain
permanent resident status for a candidate who demonstrates that her or his
work will substantially benefit the U.S.
In the cases where RFEs are received, the specific requests for
documentation have bordered on the bizarre. For example, we recently
received an RFE that where the NIW applicant/candidate would have to prove
that the applicant could not "eventually" train someone else to do
their work. Yet we know that any worker-- even an expert -- can be replaced
"eventually." In fact, every person in the world is ultimately and
arguably replaceable since one could argue that we do not need any more
cutting edge research and we can all survive without any new research or
development. Such requests have no connection with the intention of the law
underlying National Interest Waivers.
Another recent RFE for an NIW that we have seen, requests evidence that the
NIW applicant has obtained awards other than academic awards. That is indeed
a strange request, because awards are not one of the mandatory criteria for
the NIW category and may arguably be useful to show that a person is
"extraordinary." In another case, a candidate's salary was deemed
questionably low by the INS. And yet, a person's salary is not a criterion
for NIW, but rather for the EB-1 "Extraordinary Ability" process.
In NIW cases, requests for evidence of high remuneration are inappropriate.
We have also been obtaining evidence that the INS has been issuing denials
without RFEs. Especially frustrating was a petition that was summarily
denied after waiting for review by INS for over 15 months.
Another unusual fact is that we have just received 3 denials in NIW cases
from the very same Service Center that approved EB1 "Extraordinary
Ability" Petitions for these same three candidates! The denials of the
NIW petitions stated that the clients failed to meet the
"exceptional" standard. This appears to fly in the face of reason
when the INS admits that the persons satisfied the much higher standard of
extraordinary for the EB-1 Petition but could not satisfy the lower
"exceptional" standard for the EB-2 Petition. If a candidate
potentially qualifies for both NIW and EB-1, it may be worthwhile
considering to file in both categories, to improve their chance of success
for getting the "green card."
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|