 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






|
|
Department of Justice Proposes Alien Registration
Posted
Jun 14, 2002
Attorney General John Ashcroft announced on June 5, 2002 that the U.S.
Department of Justice (DOJ) plans to issue a proposed regulation that would
require some foreign nationals to register upon arrival to the U.S. and
submit to periodic monitoring thereafter. Failure to comply would prompt the
person’s information being entered into a criminal database and his or her
becoming subject to removal (deportation) from the country. Criminal
prosecution is also possible.
Authority for this regulation is covered by the existing Immigration and
Nationality Act. These provisions have been dormant for decades, however.
The proposed regulation would require selected nonimmigrants (persons coming
temporarily to the U.S., not permanent residents or foreign-born U.S.
citizens) to be fingerprinted upon arrival and to register periodically
throughout their stays. Registration will be required 30 days after arrival
and, subsequently, once a year. Foreign nationals already in the U.S. who
fall within the DOJ’s “elevated national security concern” will also be
asked to register.
Who Will Have to Register?
Currently, only persons from Iran, Iraq, Sudan, and Libya have to be
fingerprinted at the Port of Entry (POE). The new regulation would apply to
all nonimmigrant nationals of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, and Syria. According
to a DOJ press release, the regulation would also apply to “certain
nationals of other countries whom the State Department and the INS determine
to be an elevated national security risk” as well as “[a]liens identified by
INS inspectors at the point of entry upon specific criteria to be
established by the Department of Justice.”
What is Required?
After the affected person is fingerprinted at the POE, s/he will have to
appear at an INS office after 30 days to register. At that point, the
individual will have to show proof of tenancy at a stated U.S. address. This
could be in the form of a rental contract or mortgage; proof of enrollment
in school, if a student; and proof of employment, if in a working visa
status. Thereafter, the individual will have to re-register every 12 months.
S/He will also be advised of the requirement to provide change of address
notification within 10 days. As reported in the MurthyBulletin on May
24, 2002, the address change requirement has been rarely enforced. Under the
proposed regulation, however, it would be particularly important for those
covered individuals to comply with that requirement. See,
Promptly Notify INS of Change
of Address, available on MurthyDotCom.
Exit Notification
The affected person will also have to notify the INS at the time of
departure from the U.S. In a very harsh provision, the proposed regulation
would make the person ineligible to return to the U.S. for failing to report
the departure. According to the DOJ, exit records are needed in order to
identify those persons who stay in the U.S. beyond their authorization.
Persons Already Present in the U.S.
The regulation will require foreign nationals already in the U.S. who are
from the designated countries to provide proof of their current addresses
and such additional information “as the Attorney General may require.” It is
unclear how such people will become aware of the requirement and how
aggressively the INS will be pursuing penalties for failure to comply.
Penalties
Should one fail to register at either the 30-day point or annually, his/her
name will be provided to law enforcement and the person will be subject to a
$1,000 fine, incarceration, and potential removal (deportation) from the
U.S.
The U.S. Department of State points out that many European countries have
systems of tracking that are similar or even more rigorous. They also report
that they already have fingerprint-scanning capability at all POEs. They are
currently matching the fingerprints of foreign nationals who undergo
secondary inspection at the POE against the database of wanted felons. The
process takes less than two minutes. The INS reports that the results are
promising, since over 1,400 individuals were successfully apprehended
between January and May 2002.
One important concern with the registration requirement is whether it is an
appropriate use of resources, considering the individuals should have
already undergone sufficient screening prior to issuance of a visa. In the
current political climate, policies that would have been unheard of before
September 11, 2001 become possible for the sake of security. There is a line
that should not be crossed in any free society: a line between genuine
security concerns and harassment or racial profiling. This should be
especially safeguarded in our country, considered by the world to champion
liberties and freedom.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|