 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


|
|
INS on Substituting New Petition Approval in Pending I-485
Posted
Jul 31, 2000
In the June 22, 2000 issue of the MurthyBulletin article entitled,
"INS Issues Guidance on Substituting
Petitions in Pending I-485 Applications," we discussed the May
9, 2000 INS memorandum about procedures for substituting a new I-140
(employment-based petition) approval in a pending employment-based
adjustment case. The memo also discussed the issue in the family-based
context, involving the I-130 (family-based petition).
One statement in the INS memo was puzzling. That was the statement that
"a priority date may not be transferred to another preference
category." We indicated that such a rule was contrary to our previous
understanding of INS policy and requirements.
We have now been informed that the INS Acting Branch Chief for Business and
Trade Services, Efrem Hernandez, has indicated to the American Immigration
Lawyers Association (AILA) that he was referring to a substitution between
employment-based and family-based priority dates. Priority dates are, and
always have been, transferable from one employment-based category to another
in most instances. Now it is even permissible in an employment-based I-485
case to substitute a new I-140 in a different category, and in a
family-based adjustment case to substitute a new I-130 in a different
preference category. These options allow people to enjoy the benefit, for
example, of faster processing times in the EB2 category in place of an EB3
approval, or the ability to work for a different employer while the I-485
application is pending.
The rules are generally straightforward in the employment-based context. The
regulations clearly state that if a person is the beneficiary of multiple
I-140 approvals, s/he is entitled to the earliest priority date. In the
family-based context, the issues are more complex. Certain family-based
categories automatically convert to other categories when a particular
event, such as turning 21 or getting married, occurs. Also, some categories
allow for "derivative beneficiaries" (dependents) while others do
not. Substitution of I-130s is likely to raise many complications; so
further INS guidance may be needed as to whether there are any limitations
on family-based substitution. Strictly speaking, priority date transfer is a
separate issue from substitution of approvals in pending I-485 cases. Still,
the two issues interact in complex ways.
At any rate, we now know that while an I-140 cannot be substituted for an
I-130 or vice versa, it is permissible to substitute petitions in different
categories within either the family-based or the employment-based framework.
The INS expects to issue the above clarification in a formal memo.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|