 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

|
|
INS
Raid re: LCA Violations Against H1B Employer
Posted
Jan 29, 2000
We
have news reports of a raid in San Antonio, Texas, on January 20, 2000, in
which forty Indian computer programmers in H-1B status were arrested by the
INS and led away in handcuffs. The incident was allegedly a result of H1B
Petitions filed and approved by companies, for which amendments had not been
filed either before or within a reasonable time after relocation to the new
work site. Apparently, one source at the company alleged that several H1B
amendments were pending for over 6 months with INS, delaying approvals for
the employers. The companies state that in all other respects, the employers
and the employees were in compliance with immigration laws and regulations.
The companies believe that their employees were targeted based upon racial
profiling and that other employees of larger corporations working at the
same work site were not arrested or incarcerated. Apparently, the timing of
the arrest was also suspicious. Even
though INS could have arrested the workers at any time during the previous
six months, the INS waited until the project was more or less completed and
then miraculously, the raid was conducted.
On the other hand, according to INS statements, the target of a six-month
investigation leading to the arrest was contracting companies known as
"body shoppers" who had placed foreign workers in locations other
than those for which H1B petitions had been approved.
As an editorial note from the Law Office of Sheela Murthy, there may be
simple solutions to avoiding similar problems. For contracting companies,
the best way to protect the interests of the company and its employees and
to avoid a similar occurrence in the future is to ensure that all work
locations are listed on the Labor Condition Application (LCA) and on the
H-1B petition. If an employee is to be dispatched to a new work site, it is
the company's responsibility to file an amended H1B petition. Unfortunately,
it may take an incident like the one in San Antonio to convince some
companies of the seriousness of the issue. While the facts and details of
the case continue to unfold, if there was racial profiling and
discrimination, that may be reason to bring this case to the limelight and
discuss it with politicians during lobbying activities. If our government
agencies exceed the scope of the authority vested in them, it is our
responsibility, to lobby our elected representatives for justice. If any
clients or even companies who are not clients of the Law Office of Sheela
Murthy wish to present their claims before members of the U.S. Congress or
of the House of Representatives, please send us an email – law@murthy.com.
We intend to participate in Lobby Day in March 2000 organized by AILA to
meet with key legislators and voice concerns
and suggest solutions. We owe this to
U.S. employers, employees and to the cause of justice!
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|