 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




|
|
Travel Advisory : Beware at POE & Revalidation Safe Alternative
Posted
Dec 14, 2001
In early December, we received important information that INS issued a
policy decision not to exercise its discretion in granting Form I-193
document waivers at ports of entry (POEs) to those seeking entry into the
U.S. from foreign travel. INS POE Officers have apparently been instructed
not to grant I-193 Waivers, except in cases with exceptional grounds, such
as extreme medical or humanitarian emergencies. An I-193 waiver is a waiver
of documents in cases where the applicant desiring entry to the U.S. is
otherwise eligible but does not have the proper visa or other travel
document.
Waivers Discretionary and Authority Delegated to
Few Senior INS Officials Since then, we received on
December 13, 2001 a clarification that there has been no change in
substantive policy with respect to these waivers. What has changed is the
official empowered to make the decision granting the waiver. Only the INS
District Directors, Deputy District Directors, or Assistant District
Directors for inspections or examinations at local INS offices or at the POE
are authorized to make decisions granting waivers. Only these individuals
have the authority to approve parole for deferred inspections or other
reasons and to waive any documentary requirements. This responsibility
cannot be delegated to a lower level INS official. In essence, this may mean
that there will be far fewer approvals on discretionary cases since the
senior level INS officials are not available to issue waivers when most
international flights arrive in major U.S. cities.
In other words, the appropriate INS officials at various airports and other
ports of entry continue to have the discretion to waive the requirement of a
valid visa or border crossing card and/or passport, on a case-by-case basis.
The authority for this discretion is given under 8 CFR Section 212.1(g).
However, one needs to obtain the waiver from one of the senior-level INS
officials in that INS District office or POE, as outlined above.
Person Should Not Rely on the Waiver
Obtaining a waiver from the INS does not in any way eliminate the need to
have appropriate documentation for entry. In the post-9/11 era, more than
ever, each person must be able to clearly establish her/his eligibility for
entry. We also remind MurthyBulletin and MurthyDotCom readers
to avoid volunteering extraneous or unnecessary information or documentation
to the POE officer. INS has the power to consign persons seeking entry at a
POE to expedited removal if they do not withdraw their applications for
entry. The waiver of documents is only appropriate in limited circumstances.
An example of this rule would be the case of a B-2 visitor for pleasure who
has an INS approval for the change of status to an H1B within the U.S. but
who does not obtain an H1B visa stamp in the passport at a consulate outside
the U.S. and who, subsequently, seeks to re-enter in H1B status. The INS
would have discretionary authority to waive the requirement of the H1B visa.
Safer Alternative to Visa at Consulates is
Revalidation with DOS This change in INS policy
provides us with an opportunity to remind our readers that, in the current
political climate, it is best to attempt to obtain visa revalidation through
the U.S. Department of State (DOS), now located in St. Louis, MO.
Criteria for Visa Revalidation with DOS
This visa revalidation is available to one who already has the
relevant visa in her/his passport, which either is expiring within 60 days
or has expired within the last one year. This service is available for
certain visas, including H, L, O, and P. The procedure for visa
revalidations is discussed in detail and the addresses are available on
MurthyDotCom. There are a number of helpful articles that can be located by
searching "revalidation." The information regarding addresses is
summarized in our NewsBrief entitled,
Address
Changes for Re-Issuance of Visas by DOS. The DOS information regarding this subject is located
on the DOS
WebSite.
Summary of Visa Applications Abroad v.
Revalidations Although many individuals routinely
obtain their visas at the various consulates throughout the world, and there
is no need for undue alarm, there is always a risk when one leaves the U.S.
This risk is compounded by the current, increased scrutiny after September
11, 2001. If the consulate wishes to investigate a specific application, the
delay caused by the investigation, even if successfully resolved, can be
highly detrimental to the applicant. Employers may not wish to keep
positions open indefinitely, while the consulate makes a decision that could
take several weeks or months. At many consulates the Anti-Fraud Unit
investigates the credentials of the applicant or the viability of the
sponsoring employer, etc. – a slow process. The financial consequences of
being unable to commence or resume employment can cause great hardship, both
to the employer and the employee.
This problem can be resolved with some advance planning and visa
revalidations through the DOS, whenever available. While it does not
eliminate the problems faced at the port-of-entry, it at least eliminates
one hurdle to safe return to the U.S.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|