 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




|
|
Employers Provided Conversion Option in some
Pre-PERM Cases
Posted
May 25, 2007
©MurthyDotCom
The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) issued a decision on
May 21, 2007 that impacts pre-PERM labor certifications filed under the
Reduction in Recruitment (RIR) procedure. BALCA considered whether the
Certifying Officer (CO), who first grants a reduction in recruitment
request, may then deny the RIR application if s/he finds that the
application failed to document adequate consideration of U.S. workers or if
there was unlawful rejection of U.S. workers. BALCA decided that the U.S.
Department of Labor's CO cannot deny the RIR case outright in this
situation.
©MurthyDotCom
DOL Must Provide Option of Traditional
Recruitment
©MurthyDotCom
In this case, BALCA decided that the CO must first refer the application for
supervised or "traditional" recruitment (TR), because the employer should
not be penalized if s/he submitted an insufficient RIR package. Instead, the
CO has the option to deny the RIR request and refer the application for
traditional recruitment with instructions if there are special sources of
recruitment, such as laid-off workers. This is true even when the reason for
RIR denial is the rejection of a qualified U.S. worker, rather than just a
finding that the recruitment effort itself was inadequate.
©MurthyDotCom
Result - One Could Retain Earlier Priority Date
©MurthyDotCom
If an employer filed an RIR labor certification under the old, pre-PERM
system, which is only now being adjudicated, there is a risk that the
certification will be denied if there are flaws in the request for RIR.
Under this new BALCA case, however, the Certifying Officer cannot deny the
RIR labor certification, but has to refer it for the traditional
recruitment. Because of that, more people will have a chance to keep their
original priority dates, so that they potentially are able to obtain their
"green cards" sooner.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
Most RIR cases have already made their way through the system, as the
Backlog Processing Centers have cleared out over 80 percent of their cases,
as of an update the Murthy Law Firm received in mid-May 2007. Many of the
cases that are still pending are non-RIR cases, but some do remain; and
there may be others on appeal that would benefit from this decision.
Copyright © 2007, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|