 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



|
|
USCIS Revises
Guidance on CSPA : More Protection for Children Aging Out
Posted
May 23, 2008
©MurthyDotCom
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently issued
Revised Guidance for the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA)
(PDF 106KB). This significantly expands the scope and class of individuals
potentially eligible to benefit under the CSPA. The USCIS posted a series of
Questions and Answers on May 6, 2008, clarifying the new guidance and
providing background information on the CSPA. Background information on the
CSPA is available on MurthyDotCom, including our November 4, 2005
article, The Impact of
Retrogression on the CSPA. The new CSPA guidance replaced the
earlier USCIS policy, and is relevant to children who "aged out" (reached
over 21 years of age) before the CSPA was enacted, as well as those with
cases denied based upon prior policies.
©MurthyDotCom
CSPA Applies Retroactively
©MurthyDotCom
The new CSPA interpretation grants benefits to those individuals who "aged
out prior to the enactment of the CSPA." More specifically, it permits those
individuals "who did not have an application for permanent residence pending
on August 6, 2002 and did not apply subsequently for permanent residence" to
file their applications for adjustment of status at this time. Those
eligible include individuals who had an approved immigrant petition prior to
the enactment of the CSPA, are filing as immediate relatives, and whose visa
numbers became available on or after August 7, 2001.
©MurthyDotCom
Denials Based Solely on "Aging Out" may Re-File
or File MTR
©MurthyDotCom
In addition, those who filed their applications for adjustment of status
previously, but were subsequently denied solely based on the finding that
the applicant was not a child for the purposes of the CSPA, are permitted to
re-file at this time. This benefit does not apply to those applicants who
received a final decision on their applications prior to the enactment of
the CSPA or those whose applications were not denied solely based on the
CSPA ineligibility ground. In all eligible cases, applicants should file a
motion to reconsider an earlier decision with their local USCIS field
office. There is no filing fee and no deadline for filing the motion.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The new interpretation of the CSPA may benefit many applicants who had their
applications for adjustment of status denied in the past or who did not
apply for adjustment of status because they aged out before the enactment of
the CSPA. One who may be eligible to apply at this time should consult with
an immigration attorney since the CSPA involves some highly complex
concepts. A qualified, experienced professional may need to discern whether
to apply these in a specific situation in order to determine eligibility and
possible benefits under the CSPA.
Copyright © 2008, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|