 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




|
|
Revalidation Ends : Extension Urged
Posted
Jul 23, 2004
©MurthyDotCom
As regular MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers are aware,
the ability to revalidate visas from within the United States ended on July
16, 2004. This topic was covered in several articles published in the
MurthyBulletin, including our July 2, 2004 article,
Revalidation Not Required
if Not Planning to Travel. All are available on MurthyDotCom.
We are continuing to receive many questions on this topic, in terms of what
is now required of persons in the U.S. in the various statuses, including H
and L, that were previously allowed to revalidate their visas in the U.S. We
want to emphasize that this change does not place additional requirements
upon the individuals or their employers. No one needs to depart the U.S.
immediately because of this change.
©MurthyDotCom
NO NEW REQUIREMENTS
©MurthyDotCom
We wish to clarify that this change does not require individuals in H, L, O,
P, I or E status to leave the U.S. or take any other action. What this
change means is that it will no longer be possible to get a new visa stamp
issued in one's passport from within the U.S. A person will now need to
apply for the visa stamp at a U.S. consulate abroad. This does not mean that
people must engage in additional travel or suddenly leave the U.S. Nor does
it mean that those eligible to extend or change their statuses must leave
the U.S. to do so. The visa is merely a travel document. It is needed purely
for entry into the United States. It does not determine status. Status for
nonimmigrants is generally determined by the I-94 card stapled in the
passport by the CBP Inspector at the airport, or the I-94 card attached to
the latest approval notice for a person filing for an extension or change of
status in the U.S. after entry. Subject to very limited exceptions, persons
who are lawfully in the U.S. in a nonimmigrant status are able to apply to
extend or change status within the U.S. If such a request is granted, a new
I-94 will be attached to the bottom of the approval notice. It is only when
an individual wants to leave the United States and reenter that that person
will, in most cases, need to apply for a new visa stamp at a U.S. consulate
abroad.
©MurthyDotCom
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF PROGRAM
©MurthyDotCom
The visa revalidation program was a convenient service for many. It allowed
people to obtain new visas without leaving the United States. Thus, after
receiving the visa, they could travel and return without the uncertainty and
potential delays attendant to applying at the U.S. consulates abroad. Many
made their decisions as to whether to engage in optional travel based upon
whether their visas were granted under the revalidation process. Due to the
importance of this program, a number of major companies and organizations,
including the American Immigration Lawyers Association, wrote an open letter
to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Tom Ridge and Department
of State (DOS) Secretary Colin Powell urging the continuation of the
revalidation program. The letter emphasized the disruption experienced by
U.S. employers when their employees face delays in obtaining visas at the
consulates in their home countries. These delays can extend for months and
leave U.S. employers without needed, key personnel.
©MurthyDotCom
SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
©MurthyDotCom
Use ASCs for Biometrics
©MurthyDotCom
The revalidation program is ending due to the need for biometric collection
as part of the visa process. The DOS does not have the facilities for the
collection of fingerprints, photographs or other biometrics for the purposes
of visa revalidation. Therefore, the letter suggests utilizing the existing
DHS Application Support Centers (ASCs) that now collect fingerprints and
photographs in connection with green cards and other USCIS cases.
Apparently, there would need to be some computer upgrades and changes in the
ASCs' contract in order to accomplish this goal.
©MurthyDotCom
Extend "Automatic Revalidation"
©MurthyDotCom
Another suggestion, aimed at avoiding the need to apply for a visa for trips
of short duration, is to extend the automatic revalidation or contiguous
territory rule to cover all travel. This rule, essentially, allows for
persons traveling to Canada or Mexico and certain islands adjacent to the
United States to reenter without a new visa after a trip of 30 days or less.
These persons must have valid U.S. immigration status, but are able to
regain entry after the short trip even if their visas are expired. If this
rule were to be extended to travel worldwide, rather than simply to the
contiguous territories, a person with valid H status could go on a brief
business trip or vacation and return within 30 days without getting a new
visa. This would certainly reduce the burden on the consulates and
facilitate travel, with no undue security threat.
©MurthyDotCom
We want to be absolutely clear that the above is merely a suggestion. It is
NOT the law. Visas are still needed for reentry in most instances, even for
brief travel. The contiguous territory rule is the exception, which itself
has now been curtailed for those who apply for a visa at the consulate in a
contiguous territory.
©MurthyDotCom
CONCLUSION
©MurthyDotCom
U.S. businesses and the U.S. economy depend upon people being able to travel
in and out of our country. The United States has already lost some valuable
business opportunities and contracts since many are unable to obtain the
visas necessary to enter the U.S. In this global economy, similarly,
numerous foreign national employees in the U.S. need to be able to attend
meetings, seminars, conferences, and similar business engagements abroad.
The success and profitability of many projects and companies depends upon
international travel. Additionally, foreign national workers need to be able
to travel to their home countries for family visits and emergencies. The
revalidation program facilitated this freedom of movement. Without it, our
businesses and vital employees will suffer.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|