 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



|
|
Solutions to Help Employers with H1B Compliance
Posted
Mar 20, 2009
©MurthyDotCom
There has been a great deal of concern
generated as a result of recent arrests in
connection with H1B compliance. MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers were
apprised of the current situation in our February 27, 2009 article,
Arrests
of H1B Employers Increase. Many
companies do not know where to begin in order to address these matters. For the benefit of our
readers, some matters for consideration are provided
here to help employers comply with the U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL) and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) regulations.
©MurthyDotCom
Given the depth and complexities of the regulatory requirements related to
the H1B Labor Condition Application (LCA), violations are possible even for
those trying hard to comply with the rules of the system. The DOL recognizes this by
having certain inadvertent violations classified as technical in nature.
Following are some basic steps employers can take to address a common
H1B compliance concern.
©MurthyDotCom
Revoke H1B Petitions for Terminated Employees
©MurthyDotCom
When H1B employment terminates, it is necessary for the employer to document
the termination and revoke the H1B petition. When employment has ended and
the H1B petition has been revoked, there is a clear end to wage obligations.
Even when there is a clear end date to the
employment, but no revocation, there have been cases in which wages were
found to be appropriate until the confirmation date of H1B petition
revocation. This is covered in our February 6, 2009 article,
H1B Employee Termination: Employer Concerns.
Thus, if an employee is no longer working for a company, the H1B petition
should be revoked. The employer needs to keep complete documentation of the
employment termination, request revocation, and request USCIS confirmation
that H1B
was revoked.
©MurthyDotCom
Terminate or Pay Benched H1B Employees
©MurthyDotCom
The LCA regulations prohibit benching (failing to pay) H1B workers during
times when there is a lack of work. The LCA requires workers be paid the
prevailing wage during their employment. It is required that employers with workers for whom they have no work terminate the
employees and revoke the H1B petitions. If the employer has some work, it
may be worth amending the H1B petitions for part-time employment, as
explained in our December 5, 2008 article,
Part-Time H1B Helpful during Recession.
©MurthyDotCom
While it is possible for an employee to request leave, employers
should not try to use this provision as a disguise for benching, since it
could be tantamount to fraud or misrepresentation. This
effort is usually quite transparent, as workers in the United States do not routinely
request extended periods of unpaid leave, other than for maternity or
serious personal or family emergency situations. Such claims, therefore,
need to be well supported and should be consistent with normal U.S. business
practices and common sense.
©MurthyDotCom
If an
employer simply does not have work for an individual to perform, and cannot
afford to pay the employee, then, unfortunately, it is time to terminate the
position and revoke the H1B petition. While most employers would prefer not
terminate good workers, compliance with H1B law and requirements is
mandatory to avoid problems with enforcement and in order to be allowed to
continue sponsoring H1B workers who are needed. Employees in this difficult
situation are not without options. See article #2 in this week's
MurthyBulletin entitled,
Impact
of H1B Revocations on Employees.
If necessary, this matter should be discussed in consultation with a
qualified, experienced immigration attorney.
©MurthyDotCom
Obligation Applies upon Change of Status
©MurthyDotCom
If a foreign national employee is in the United States and has obtained a change of
status to H1B, the employer's obligation to pay begins on the first day of
the H1B validity or "eligible to work" date, if the employee makes
her/himself available. Employers sometimes are under the mistaken impression that
they can control the obligation to pay new H1B employees by not releasing
the H1B I-94 documents. They erroneously believe that the H1B LCA
obligations are not activated until they say so. This is not correct for
foreign nationals within the U.S. for whom the employers have requested and
obtained changes of status.
It is also not correct for foreign nationals who have entered the U.S. and
who hold H1B status based upon the particular employer's approved H1B
petition.
©MurthyDotCom
Employers Must Show Good Faith to Avoid Harsher Penalties
©MurthyDotCom
The DOL has some discretion, once it has
conducted an investigation, as to the types
and levels of penalties assessed. There may be less harsh consequences for
past violations, if there is evidence of current compliance. While it is
appropriate to take remedial action to fix problems for the future, however,
there should not be any attempted cover up or falsification. Efforts of this type will
make the problem worse, potentially leading to criminal charges.
Revoking H1B petitions is a typical remedial
action. Other corrective steps often include filing H1B petition amendments
and new LCAs for changed locations of employment, paying back wages, and
organizing documentation, including public access files.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
Employers must take H1B compliance seriously. It is important to
recognize the seriousness of the obligations contained in the LCA. At the
heart of the matter is the need to have proper LCAs in place and to pay the
required wages. Employees should seek sound legal advice to know their
options, rather than trying to convince their H1B-petitioning employers not
to revoke their petitions. Employers with concerns about their H1B practices
should obtain legal advice. It may be necessary for employers to make
changes in their practices and business models to ensure compliance with H1B
requirements.
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|