 
 
|
|
Good News : USCIS Rescinds Negative RFE Memo!
Posted
Feb 25, 2005
©MurthyDotCom
We at The Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C. are pleased to report some
positive immigration news that will be of interest to many MurthyDotCom
and MurthyBulletin readers! The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) issued a memo on February 16, 2005, to all Regional
Directors, Service Center Directors, District Directors, and
Officers-In-Charge that rescinds the controversial May 4, 2004 Memo
regarding Requests for Evidence (RFEs). The May 4, 2004 Memo was being used
by many adjudicators to justify denials of cases without the issuance of an
RFE and without providing the parties with an opportunity to address
perceived weaknesses in a case. The May 4, 2004 Memo was addressed in our
May 7, 2004 MurthyBulletin article,
USCIS Memo: More Denials, Fewer RFEs, available on MurthyDotCom.
©MurthyDotCom
Samplings Used to Help Determine Revised Policy
©MurthyDotCom
The February 16, 2005 Memo indicates that the prior (May 4, 2004) RFE Memo
was issued because adjudicators were issuing RFEs on cases that were clearly
not approvable under any circumstance. These are cases that, essentially,
are asking for an immigration benefit that does not exist. The issuance of
RFEs in these cases resulted in delays in the processing of legitimate
cases. As explained below, this category of case can still be denied without
an RFE.
©MurthyDotCom
Since the May 2004 RFE Memo was issued, the USCIS looked at another sampling
of files. They found that many cases were being denied that could have been
approved if the applicants had been given the opportunity to provide
additional information in response to the RFEs or Notices of Intent to Deny
(NOIDs). On this basis, the USCIS has recognized that the "denial without
RFE" system was of no greater help to customers of the USCIS than the prior
practice of issuing essentially useless RFEs. In light of these revelations,
the USCIS has now taken the step of rescinding the prior Memo and issuing
the new (February 16, 2005) RFE Memo.
©MurthyDotCom
Outright Denials Allowed under Certain
Circumstances
©MurthyDotCom
The new RFE Memo retains the concept that a case may be denied if it is
clearly not approvable. These are cases where basic statutory or regulatory
requirements are clearly missing.
©MurthyDotCom
This includes cases where the applicant or petitioner is categorically
ineligible to receive a benefit, including, but not limited to:
Applications for
naturalization from persons under the age of 18 years;
I-130 relative
petitions filed for ineligible classes of relatives, such as grandparents or
nieces;
L-1 inter-company
transferee petitions where the company in the U.S. clearly has no
relationship to a foreign company abroad;
Cases where the
evidence shows that a substantive requirement for a benefit cannot be met,
including, but not limited to:
- an H1B
petition for a factory machine operator or other position that clearly
does not require a bachelor's degree or higher;
- an E-1 or E-2
treaty trader or investor petition filed for a beneficiary who is not
a national of a country that has a qualifying treaty with the U.S.; or
- an H2B
temporary worker petition for a beneficiary who has already been in
the U.S. for three years or more without a six-month absence.
Approval of an Application or Petition without
an RFE or NOID
©MurthyDotCom
The February 16, 2005 new RFE Memo clearly provides that, if an applicant or
petitioner has established eligibility for the immigration benefit sought,
the case should be approved. The new RFE Memo reminds adjudicators that the
old "Zero Tolerance Memo" issued in 2002 as a reaction to 9/11 has been
rescinded. [More information is available in our Oct 3, 2003 article
'Zero Tolerance' Policy Withdrawn.]
Therefore, there is no need to issue RFEs or NOIDs merely to eliminate all
potential doubt and all possibility for fraud. Instead, the new RFE Memo
recognizes that the standard for petitioners and applicants is a
"preponderance of the evidence" standard. This is a term of law meaning that
the petitioner or applicant must establish that it is more likely than not
that the person or entity filing the application or petition has met the
burden of proof for the case to be approved. This is a much lower standard
than the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard in criminal matters or the
"clear and convincing" standard in quasi-criminal cases, both of which are
far more stringent.
©MurthyDotCom
When Issuance of RFE or NOID is Appropriate
©MurthyDotCom
If an adjudicator believes that the evidence provided raises questions about
eligibility or does not fully establish eligibility, the issuance of an RFE
or NOID is still discretionary. The new RFE Memo strongly recommends,
however, that the adjudicator issue the RFE or NOID. The Memo gives guidance
as to how the examiner is to decide between issuing an RFE or NOID.
©MurthyDotCom
Selecting to Send an RFE
©MurthyDotCom
The February 16, 2005 new RFE Memo directs an adjudicator to issue an RFE,
rather than a NOID, if a necessary piece or pieces of evidence are missing.
According to the Memo, "the highest quality RFE is one that limits the
request to the missing evidence. Generally, it is unacceptable to issue a
RFE for a broad range of evidence when, after review of the record so far,
only a small number of types of evidence is still required." The new RFE
Memo recognizes that RFEs requesting a full gamut of information when only a
small amount is needed to make a final decision "overburdens the USCIS'
customers, over-documents the file, and wastes examination resources through
the review of unnecessary, duplicative, or irrelevant documents." This
directive is obviously a welcome one and, hopefully, something that will
make its way into actual practice.
©MurthyDotCom
While adjudicators may use template language in an RFE, the Memo advises
that all requests included in a particular template may not be appropriate
for every RFE. Therefore, adjudicators are advised in the new RFE Memo not
to send the entire template but only the portions applicable to the
particular case.
©MurthyDotCom
Selecting to Issue a NOID
©MurthyDotCom
USCIS adjudicators are directed to issue a NOID rather than an RFE if the
filing does not appear to establish eligibility by the preponderance of the
evidence, the case appears ineligible for approval but not necessarily
incurable, or the adjudicator intends to rely on evidence not submitted by
the filer for denial of the case. Under the new RFE Memo, NOIDs must provide
an explanation as to why the case might be denied in order to give the
applicant or petitioner the opportunity to respond or rebut the concerns of
the adjudicator.
©MurthyDotCom
NOIDs are currently required under regulation in lieu of outright denial for
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) petitions, adjustment of status
applications for certain physicians, and certain legalization applications.
This regulation may be changed in the future.
©MurthyDotCom
Evaluating Responses to RFEs and NOIDS
©MurthyDotCom
The new RFE Memo reminds adjudicators to evaluate cases based on the
complete record of evidence once RFE or NOID responses are received. They
are not supposed to simply rely upon the information provided in response to
the RFE or the NOID. The Memo recognizes that an RFE response may result in
the need for the issuance of another RFE or NOID. The Memo indicates,
however, that it should be much rarer that another NOID or an RFE is issued
after receiving a NOID response. We note that it is best to assume that, in
most cases, the RFE or NOID response will be the last opportunity to supply
evidence and address issues of concern prior to a decision. Thus, it should
be treated as such and prepared so that all necessary evidence and arguments
are made with the response to the RFE or the NOID. It may be that the case
will be transferred for an interview or another RFE / NOID will be issued,
but one should never assume that s/he will be given another chance.
©MurthyDotCom
Referrals for Fraud
©MurthyDotCom
In addition to issuing an RFE or NOID when appropriate, the adjudicator may
also refer a case to a Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS)
Immigration Officer if the adjudicator suspects fraud. Such a referral,
however, must be based on conflicting or derogatory information available to
the adjudicator that would lead a reasonable person to question the
truthfulness of the applicant, petitioner, and/or other entity (such as
attorney) associated with the benefits sought.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The new RFE Memo reflects that the USCIS has a commitment to customer
service even while security remains a priority. We not only applaud, but
offer a standing ovation to the USCIS for the decision to rescind the May 4,
2004 RFE Memo and issue a more instructive and comprehensive guidance to its
officers. Issued on February 16, 2005, this made a nice gift during the week
of St. Valentine's Day for the benefit of the immigrant community!
|
|
|
