 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



|
|
CSC Updates I-485 Issues : November 2003
Posted
Nov 21, 2003
Meetings occur periodically between the American Immigration Lawyers
Association liaison and representatives from the California Service Center
(CSC). The liaison has the opportunity to ask a variety of questions
regarding policies and procedures, as well as current problem areas. We know
that many MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers have
Adjustment of Status (I-485) cases pending at the California Service Center.
What follows is the most recent information available regarding I-485 cases
at the CSC.
Processing Time Reductions
The CSC predicts that, over the next six months, they will reduce the
processing times for I-485s to within one year. They have allocated
additional personnel to this task. The current processing times as published
by the CSC show close to a two-year backlog. Reducing the processing times
will require an enormous effort on the part of the CSC. We welcome an
improvement in this area, but have seen many such promises go unfulfilled in
the past. Additionally, if Service Center employees are merely being
reassigned to work on the backlog, they are not processing some other type
of case. What the Service Centers need are sufficient resources to process
all cases in a timely manner, rather than merely shifting people from
processing one category of cases to another.
If the promised reduction becomes a reality, we should see a flurry of case
decisions over the next few months. Processing times should show substantial
forward movement as well.
Concurrent Filings
CSC confirmed that I-485s filed concurrently with
I-140s are adjudicated in the order they are filed, whether filed
concurrently or following the approval of an I-140 petition. Therefore, for
many people, the concurrent filing is often beneficial in this regard. As we
have noted on prior occasions, however, some of the Service Centers review
an I-140 before issuing an EAD or AP if the I-140 and I-485 are filed
concurrently. It may be beneficial to consider filing the forms one after
the other, namely filing the I-485 about a month after filing the I-140, to
enable speedy receipt of the EAD and AP.
Interviews
Certain I-485 cases are set for interviews at the local offices. There are
some types of cases that will almost always be scheduled for interviews.
When an individual has a criminal background or prior serious immigration
violations, s/he usually is required to undergo an in-person interview at
the local USCIS office. The same is true for some cases filed using Section
245(i) to overcome immigration violations. Other potential issues can also
cause USCIS to insist upon an in-person interview. While some people believe
that all AC21 cases are forwarded to local offices for interviews, this is
not true. The case of a person with an AC21 case may be forwarded for an
interview, just as a case of a person who has been with the same employer
for the entire time period may also be forwarded. There are random quality
control-related personal interviews that have nothing to do with a person's
file.
The CSC indicated that they are in the process of trying to make an initial
identification of cases that need to have interview at the local office. If
successful, the cases would then be transferred to the local office upon
receipt, rather than remaining with CSC for many months, only to be sent to
the local office for decision. We believe that this should be helpful in
terms of reducing the backlogs.
AC21 Portability
The CSC was asked whether they wanted to be notified of AC21 portability
proactively, rather than just waiting for a Request for Evidence (RFE) to be
issued. They did not state that notification was required, but did state
that applicants should "feel free" to provide the notification. They still
may issue an RFE, even if notified earlier of the job change, because the
materials may not reach the file in time.
File Updates
Given the extended processing times for I-485s at the CSC, they are issuing
new fingerprint notices for persons whose fingerprints have expired, or who
were too young for fingerprinting at the time of filing the I-485, but are
now 14 years old or older. In many cases, they are sending out RFEs asking
for new employment verification as well.
We thank the CSC for this helpful information. We hope that the faster I-485
processing becomes a reality in the upcoming months.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|