 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



|
|
Premium Processing Delays Other Petitions
Posted
Mar 28, 2003
As has been apparent to many, the Premium Processing program has caused
delays in processing routinely-filed applications and petitions. The Office
of the Inspector General announced this finding in a February 2003 Audit
Report. As regular MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers
will recall, the Premium Processing program provides for expedited
processing of Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker, in exchange for
an additional filing fee of $1,000. The I-129 is used for employer petitions
for nonimmigrant workers, such as the H1B and L-1. Several articles
regarding Premium Processing can be found on MurthyDotCom, including our
June 1, 2001 article, INS
Set to Begin Premium Processing June 1, 2001, and, from June 8,
2001, INS Issues
Instructions for Premium Processing.
The Premium Processing program provides that the Petition will be reviewed
in 15 days. This could mean an approval or, if the case is not sufficiently
documented in the view of the adjudicator, a Request for Evidence (RFE). In
the case of an RFE, the INS (now BCIS) has an additional 15 days to process
the case after receipt of the additional documentation. If these guidelines
are not met, the $1,000 is supposed to be returned.
The program was intended, in part, to reduce backlogs in processing. The
regulation allowing for the collection of the $1000 fee states that the
additional funds collected are to be used to hire additional personnel, to
improve service for all applications and petitions. Unfortunately, it is not
having the desired effect. The audit recommended that the $1000 fee be
studied, to determine if the money is being allocated as required by law.
The audit found that the, then, INS, had largely met the 15-day deadlines
for case processing. This is consistent with our experience at The Law
Office of Sheela Murthy. However, the processing of the cases that did not
use premium processing was delayed. This, too, is consistent with our
experience. According to the audit, the backlog has increased steadily to a
level of 3.2 million in September 2002. There is not sufficient information
to determine the cost of running the Premium Processing program. Therefore,
although the program generated $115 million dollars in Fiscal Year 2002,
there is not enough information to determine whether resources are properly
allocated. To date, the program has generated over $136 million in
additional fees.
The audit found that there has been inadequate oversight of the Premium
Processing program, which is exceeding its projected revenue and is in need
of "active managerial scrutiny." The audit concludes that, in order for the
Premium Processing program to reach its objective of reducing backlogs,
there is a need for greater efficiency in the adjudications process. To meet
this objective, the BCIS must generate data regarding the amount of
resources (human and otherwise) needed for the program.
It is unclear whether this report will cause any changes in either Premium
Processing or regular processing at the Service Centers. We encourage the
BCIS to use this report to continue the important Premium Processing Service
while improving regular processing systems.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|