 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






|
|
DOL Update on RIR
Processing Guidelines
Posted
Nov 28, 2003
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a Memo on November 20, 2003, on a
change in policy with respect to Reductions in Recruitment (RIRs). In this
Memo, Mr. Carlson directs regional DOL Certifying Officers on how to handle
labor certification RIR processing in light of the changing economy. This
Memo, issued by William L. Carlson, Chief of the Division of Foreign Labor
Certification, follows earlier memos on the same topic issued by Mr.
Carlson's predecessor, Dale Zeigler. The Zeigler procedures were analyzed in
MurthyBulletin articles,
DOL Issues RIR Guidance in
Light of Layoffs (April 5, 2002), and
Department of Labor Update:
May 2002 (June 7, 2002), available on MurthyDotCom. One of
the reasons cited for the new guidelines is the expectation of the
implementation of the PERM program, which will entirely alter the labor
certification process. For articles about PERM and its implementation, see
our PERM Page on
MurthyDotCom. The DOL separately stated on November 21, 2003 that final
PERM regulations will not be published until sometime in early 2004, and
that the new procedures will not be implemented until 120 days (about 4
months) after its publication.
The Carlson Memo sets forth procedures pertaining to the recruitment efforts
necessary to test the job market, as needed for a labor certification
approval, in light of the current state of the U.S. economy. The problem,
essentially, is that the job market is tested before filing in RIR cases,
with a showing that there are no available workers at that time. Given the
backlogs in labor certification processing, however, the economy may have
changed significantly since the original filing of the RIR case. The Zeigler
memos from 2002 require additional recruitment if circumstances during the
six months prior to the review of a labor certification application indicate
that there are U.S. workers available for the position.
The November 20, 2003 Carlson Memo appears to place restrictions on the
DOL's ability to require such additional recruitment. The stated purpose of
the Carlson Memo is to address the problem of backlogged RIR cases in the
information technology field in several of the DOL's Regional Offices. The
Memo recognizes that it is undesirable to send the cases that would normally
be remanded to the State Workforce Agencies (SWAs) back to the SWAs, because
this would cause additional delays of two years or more. To address this,
the Memo provides four Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the Regional
Offices to use in addressing the problem.
Initial Review SOP
The first procedure is an initial review. At this stage, a Certifying
Officer may deny the RIR if the labor certification is not complete. For
example, an incomplete labor certification may fail to include an
explanation of an employer's recent layoffs. Under the Memo, such labor
certifications will receive a Notice of Findings (NOFs) and the employer
will be given the standard thirty-five day opportunity to rebut the findings
of the Certifying Officer.
Additional Recruitment May or May Not be
Required
The remaining applications will be divided into two categories. One category
is applications where the minimum stated experience and education required
is at least a bachelor's degree and three additional years of experience or
a master's degree and six additional months of experience. If the education
and experience requirements for such applications meet these criteria and
proper recruitment was performed prior to filing, the Memo directs them to
be certified without retesting. In other words, the Certifying Officers are
not to look at current labor market conditions when certifying these cases.
These cases will only be reviewed for the adequacy of the recruitment
performed prior to filing the RIR case.
The second category is for labor certifications in which the minimum
requirements for the position are below a bachelor's degree and three
additional years of experience or a master's degree and six additional
months of experience. The Certifying Officer must review the application to
determine whether the recruitment report has sufficient detail and
demonstrates that recruitment was adequate. If sufficient, the labor
certification will be certified. Because cases that fall into the second
category are subject to the retesting provisions, it would appear that the
Certifying Officer is permitted to look into current market conditions in
making the determination as to whether retesting is required or whether to
simply certify the case.
Retest SOP
If an application cannot be certified after initial review, the Certifying
Officer is directed to send a letter to the employer and/or the employer's
attorney setting forth three choices of action: withdraw the RIR request;
have the case remanded to the SWA for traditional recruitment; or conduct a
one-day retest of the labor market. If the latter option is selected, the
employer must report the results of the one-day retest to the Certifying
Officer within 60 days of receipt of the letter. If retesting is selected,
and the retest information is not received by the DOL within 67 days of the
date of the letter, the Certifying Officer will consider the case abandoned.
The report to the Certifying Officer on the market retest must specifically
identify all applicants who sought employment and the disposition of each
application. Further, the DOL is encouraging, though not requiring,
employers to include the applicants' resumes.
Look Back SOP
If additional recruitment is required for an RIR application, the Memo
provides that any testing of the market that occurred within the prior six
months will be deemed sufficient, provided the employer has a copy of the
advertisement and a detailed report of the disposition of each application
for the position. The Certifying Officer may review the resumes that were
submitted for the position. This is a favorable change, as prior to this
Memo only advertisements placed within the last 60 days would be considered.
Application Modification SOP
Modifications of the labor certification at the retest stage are permitted
if the modifications do not change the occupational classification of the
job. The modifications must meet all normal applicable DOL rules regarding
job requirements. This may be a critical factor for employers that, during
the previous strong economy, had been instructed by the DOL to reduce their
minimum job requirements to avoid having these perceived as too restrictive.
Now employers will have a limited opportunity to have the minimum
requirements for the position more accurately reflect the true minimum
requirements for the position, thus limiting the number of potentially
qualified applicants.
Conclusion
The November 20, 2003 Carlson Memo contains some significant and potentially
beneficial changes for labor certification applications filed using the RIR
procedure. We think the new SOPs may help speed the resolution of some
long-delayed RIR cases. It will also avoid the rather unfair situation that
occurs regularly, where a labor certification case is advertised and filed
at a time when the economy was good and then is reviewed, sometimes several
years later, at a time when the economy is struggling.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|