| |

EAD Extension Rule Published on July 30, 2004
Posted
Aug 06, 2004
©MurthyDotCom
As we anticipated for MurthyDotCom visitors in our July 29, 2004
online NewsFlash,
the USCIS has published an interim rule permitting most Employment
Authorization Documents (EADs) to be issued for time periods of over one
year. The rule, published on July 30, 2004, is effective immediately. There
is an opportunity for written comments to be submitted, through September
28, 2004. In brief, the interim rule amends the regulations regarding the
issuance of EADs to allow the USCIS to establish validity periods for EADs
based upon a number of stated factors. Before this adjustment, EADs
generally were valid for one year, except in certain cases like for spouses
on E-2 or L-2 status who were able to obtain EADs for longer than one year.
Now, under the interim rule, an EAD may be issued for a period longer or
shorter than the one year timeframe.
©MurthyDotCom
Reasons for Possibly Longer EADs
©MurthyDotCom
This change is part of the ongoing effort to streamline the USCIS and reduce
the case processing backlogs. The problem with EADs is rather circular. A
prime example is the processing time for the I-485, Application for
Adjustment of Status. Individuals with I-485s pending are eligible to
request EADs. With I-485s often backlogged for several years, particularly
in the employment-based context, people had to apply for EAD extensions at
least once, if not twice or even thrice. These repeated EAD filings create
significant additional work for the USCIS and add to the backlogs in other
areas. The EAD filings represent a substantial portion of the USCIS
workload. They receive over 950,000 EAD requests each year. Thus, permitting
validity periods in excess of one year should help to considerably reduce
the USCIS workload.
©MurthyDotCom
Factors to Consider Regarding the Durations of
EADs
©MurthyDotCom
Under the interim rule, the USCIS will have discretion and flexibility to
establish the length of EADs for various categories of eligible individuals.
They will be able to consider relevant factors such as security
considerations, application processing times, response times for background
checks, the individuals' immigration statuses, or other factors that they
deem relevant. The regulation allows the USCIS to both increase and decrease
the validity of the EAD period, as appropriate to the situation.
©MurthyDotCom
Initial and Renewal EADs are Subject to Rule
©MurthyDotCom
The interim rule applies to applications for initial EADs as well as
extensions and replacement cards. Prior to the interim regulation most EAD
periods were set at one year, either by regulation or policy. Now they will
vary in duration, depending upon how an individual is classified. Even
within the classes of individuals, however, the USCIS will have authority to
reduce the validity period for an individual, if it is warranted.
©MurthyDotCom
To have uniformity, the USCIS will issue guidance to adjudicators
establishing standard criteria for application in those instances where they
should use their discretion to reduce the length of the EAD validity period
for an individual.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
It will be a welcome relief to be able to obtain EAD cards that have
extended validity periods related to the processing times for the I-485 or
based on the processing times of particular USCIS local offices. The need to
extend the EAD each year, to obtain the new EAD in order to be able to work
or continue to work, is a source of stress to everyone involved in the
immigration process. This change, if widely and generously applied, should
reduce the workload and stress levels for the employer, the employee, the
USCIS, and the attorney, all of whom are involved in repeated filings for
EAD extensions.
©
The Law
Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.

|
|