| |

Adjustment
Cases Delayed by Name Checks - February 2008
Posted
Feb 22, 2008 |
updated Feb 22, 2008; 11:30am (Eastern Time)
©MurthyDotCom
There was a stir created in the immigration community, resulting from the
revised procedures for security checks, as reported February 7, 2008 in our
NewsFlash,
Faster Security
Clearances for I-485s and Other Applications. Many of those
individuals with cases that have been delayed, sometimes for years, due to
lack of name check clearances, have sought action in their cases based upon
the February 4, 2008 Michael Aytes memo. The U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced steps that are being taken to
identify eligible cases, essentially asking everyone for patience as these cases
are processed over the course of the next several
months.
©MurthyDotCom
Remedy Available under the February 2008 Aytes
Memo
©MurthyDotCom
As background, the new procedures allow for approval of pending I-485,
Application for Adjustment of Status ("green card"), cases even without the
FBI response to the "name check" portion of the series of background
checks that are required in I-485 cases. The name check is requested in all
cases, and the USCIS must wait 180 days for the results. If there is no
response after 180 days, and the case is otherwise approvable, then the
USCIS must approve the case. This is a significant change from the prior
procedure that required the USCIS to wait, no matter how long it took,
for a response from the FBI.
©MurthyDotCom
USCIS Requests Patience
©MurthyDotCom
As is understandable, many requests for
action, on a "me first" basis, have reached the USCIS. In response, the
USCIS has confirmed that sweeps are being conducted to identify all eligible
I-485 cases, and has asked for time to do so. They initially
requested that inquiries into
eligible cases wait until after April 30, 2008.
On February 21, an announcement indicated that the date for inquiries
changed to March 30, 2008. However, on the same day, FAQs on the Security
Check memo were withdrawn by the USCIS. Therefore, it appears that some
aspects of this new procedure are in flux. More information will be provided
as it becomes available.
©MurthyDotCom
Ongoing Service Center Sweeps
©MurthyDotCom
The USCIS is conducting the sweeps at the service centers. This essentially
means that they systematically search their records for
eligible cases. Since many of these cases have been reviewed and otherwise
processed, they, hopefully, will be approved once identified. Of course,
some may need to submit updated information, such as employment letters or
fingerprints. Some Requests for Evidence (RFEs) may also result from the sweeps.
©MurthyDotCom
What Exactly Does this Mean for a Long Pending
Security Delayed I-485?
©MurthyDotCom
It is less clear what is occurring with pending
cases at the local offices. Further information may be forthcoming. For the
time being, as explained above, the USCIS has asked attorneys and applicants
to wait, presumably until March 30, 2008, before submitting further requests
for action based upon the new policy. They anticipate identifying and taking
action on cases by that date. It is unclear if "taking action" means issuing
final approvals, as, given the volume of cases, this would seem to be a
significant task. Of course, as evidenced last summer, the USCIS has the
ability to move great numbers of I-485 cases quickly when it is a priority.
©MurthyDotCom
It should be noted that it appears as though congressional offices have received a great number of requests for action based upon the new
policy, as well. It seems that those requests also will have to wait for the results
of the USCIS sweeps.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
Given the ongoing delays in case processing, many people continue to file
writs of mandamus against the FBI and the USCIS. They can now include the
recent Aytes memo as part of their arguments in efforts to expedite their
cases. In instances where priority dates are not current, individuals must
continue to wait. While this memo is beneficial to many
employment-based applicants in the long run, it cannot assist with problems
created by the lack of available visa numbers.
Copyright © 2008, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved

|
|