| |

Vermont
Service Center : February 2006 Update
Posted
Mar 10, 2006
©MurthyDotCom
The Vermont Service Center (VSC) Adjudications Manager, Keith Canney, spoke
at a Washington DC Chapter meeting of the American Immigration Lawyers
Association (AILA) at the end of February 2006. All of the attorneys from
the Murthy Law Firm attended this important VSC meeting. Following are some
insights provided by Mr. Canney regarding VSC operations and current
policies that we believe will prove beneficial to MurthyDotCom and
MurthyBulletin readers.
©MurthyDotCom
VSC Case Backlog Reduction
©MurthyDotCom
The VSC, along with the other Service Centers, is completing a four-year
effort to reduce their case backlogs. Their goal, ultimately, is to be able
to process a case within six months of the filing date, in most instances.
They have largely met this goal, as can be seen by current processing times.
This is a remarkable improvement. As long-time readers of MurthyDotCom
and the MurthyBulletin will recall, case processing times previously
exceeded a year or more for certain types of cases.
©MurthyDotCom
Since many of the processing time goals have been met, some of the
additional staff used for this purpose have been detailed or sent to the
local offices. The VSC will review processing times to determine whether
these individuals need to be recalled to the VSC to help in the future.
©MurthyDotCom
I-485 "Take Backs"
©MurthyDotCom
The VSC has taken back a significant number of I-485 Adjustment of Status
cases from local USCIS offices. Mr. Canney specifically mentioned 11,000
cases from New York City and 7,000 from Washington D.C. These are cases that
were sent to the local office for personal interviews. The VSC is going to
review them with an eye toward the possibility of waiving the personal
interviews. Those who cannot have the interviews waived will be returned to
the local offices to schedule the interviews. An earlier report on this
matter can be found in our December 2, 2005 MurthyBulletin article,
USCIS at NY and Washington DC Sends I-485s
Back to VSC, available on MurthyDotCom.
©MurthyDotCom
Service Centers to Allocate and Work on Specific
Types of Cases
©MurthyDotCom
The USCIS has plans to make some significant changes in the way that cases
are processed in the future. Not much detail was provided, but they
indicated that they will move toward sharing a national workload system
based on the types of forms. That is, certain forms will be handled by the
Nebraska Service Center and Texas Service Center, while other types of forms
will go to the Service Centers in California and Vermont. This should
improve efficiency in terms of managing the cap counts and specializing in
limited types of cases.
©MurthyDotCom
Move towards True Electronic Filing
©MurthyDotCom
There is also a plan to shift from the transactional, case-by-case approach,
with efforts to have cases filed and adjudicated electronically. Important
in this endeavor is a proposal to set up employer accounts, so that
documentary information does not have to be sent with each case. Our January
13, 2006 article, USCIS Proposal Expansion
of eFilings for all H1Bs (available on MurthyDotCom)
describes this in the H1B context.
©MurthyDotCom
I-485s that Become Current
©MurthyDotCom
Many MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers have I-485s
pending and priority dates that are not current. With the monthly issuance
of the U.S. Department of State Visa Bulletin
(always available on our website), however, one can track whether a priority
date is current. In order to locate those cases with priority dates that
have become current, the VSC conducts sweeps of its I-485 files. Readers
should keep in mind that, just because a date has become current, it does
not mean necessarily that a decision will be issued immediately. The VSC
noted that, in some instances, fingerprinting will be required again due to
the ages of the cases. They will move cases as quickly as possible, but
there still can be delays due to name checks.
©MurthyDotCom
I-140 Adjudications with Retrogression
©MurthyDotCom
A question was asked as to whether or how retrogression and the
unavailability of visa numbers is impacting I-140 petition adjudications.
The VSC advised that they are not specifically shifting adjudicators away
from I-140 petitions. Some of the I-140 adjudicators, however, also
adjudicate I-485 adjustment applications. Thus, as more I-485s become
eligible for adjudication because of forward movement in the Visa Bulletin
cutoff dates, some of the adjudications staff may be needed for the I-485
cases, which will likely cause a slowdown in I-140 petition processing.
©MurthyDotCom
We thank Mr. Canney for this helpful information and for the time he spent
with our local AILA chapter.
Copyright © 2006, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved

|
|